vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE) and Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($58.0M vs $32.7M, roughly 1.8× Good Times Restaurants Inc.). Good Times Restaurants Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -207.7%, a 208.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (699.6% vs -10.0%). Good Times Restaurants Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.2M vs $-75.2M).
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is an energy storage solutions provider that designs, produces and deploys safe long-duration zinc-based battery systems. It serves utility, commercial, industrial and microgrid customers across North America, Europe and Asia, supporting grid stability and renewable energy integration.
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
EOSE vs GTIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $58.0M | $32.7M |
| Net Profit | $-120.5M | $181.0K |
| Gross Margin | -93.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -140.1% | 0.9% |
| Net Margin | -207.7% | 0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 699.6% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 55.1% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.53 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $58.0M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.5M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $34.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-120.5M | $181.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-641.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-222.9M | $-624.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-268.1M | $164.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $230.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $618.0K |
| Q4 25 | -93.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -111.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -234.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -324.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -140.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -200.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -419.1% | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -506.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -712.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | -207.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2102.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1463.2% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 144.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3696.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.53 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.91 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.30 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $568.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $813.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-2.2B | $33.2M |
| Total Assets | $885.2M | $82.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $568.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $813.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $448.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $316.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.2B | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3B | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1B | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-942.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1B | $32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $31.6M |
| Q4 25 | $885.2M | $82.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $328.2M | $85.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $86.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $263.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.3M | $89.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $90.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $89.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-50.3M | $1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-75.2M | $1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -129.7% | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 43.1% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-265.0M | $-72.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-50.3M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.9M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-66.1M | $714.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-42.7M | $-518.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $394.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-75.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.7M | $735.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-73.2M | $-105.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.8M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-466.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2M |
| Q4 25 | -129.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -271.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -480.2% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -323.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -769.1% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 43.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 180.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
