vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE) and Orange County Bancorp, Inc. (OBT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($58.0M vs $33.0M, roughly 1.8× Orange County Bancorp, Inc.). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.6% vs -207.7%, a 245.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (699.6% vs 20.6%). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.3M vs $-75.2M).
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is an energy storage solutions provider that designs, produces and deploys safe long-duration zinc-based battery systems. It serves utility, commercial, industrial and microgrid customers across North America, Europe and Asia, supporting grid stability and renewable energy integration.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is a Delaware-registered bank holding company operating mainly in New York, U.S. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, loans and wealth management solutions, serving individual consumers, small and mid-sized corporate clients in its regional footprint.
EOSE vs OBT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $58.0M | $33.0M |
| Net Profit | $-120.5M | $12.4M |
| Gross Margin | -93.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -140.1% | 41.4% |
| Net Margin | -207.7% | 37.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 699.6% | 20.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 55.1% | 73.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.53 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $58.0M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.5M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $28.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $27.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-120.5M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-641.4M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-222.9M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $8.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-268.1M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | -93.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -111.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -234.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -324.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -140.1% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -200.6% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -419.1% | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -506.2% | 40.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -712.8% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | -207.7% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2102.1% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1463.2% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 144.7% | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3696.7% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.53 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.91 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.30 | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $568.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $813.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-2.2B | $284.4M |
| Total Assets | $885.2M | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $568.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $813.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $448.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $316.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.2B | $284.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3B | $270.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1B | $252.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-942.2M | $201.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1B | $185.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $168.7M |
| Q4 25 | $885.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $328.2M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $263.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-50.3M | $43.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-75.2M | $41.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -129.7% | 125.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 43.1% | 7.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-265.0M | $69.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-50.3M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.9M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-66.1M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.9M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-42.7M | $34.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-75.2M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.7M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-73.2M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.8M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | -129.7% | 125.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -271.1% | 87.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -480.2% | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -323.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -769.1% | 120.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.9% |
| Q4 25 | 43.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 180.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.91× | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
