vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. (EOSE) and PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($83.1M vs $58.0M, roughly 1.4× Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc.). PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp runs the higher net margin — -38.1% vs -207.7%, a 169.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (699.6% vs 20.2%).
Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. is an energy storage solutions provider that designs, produces and deploys safe long-duration zinc-based battery systems. It serves utility, commercial, industrial and microgrid customers across North America, Europe and Asia, supporting grid stability and renewable energy integration.
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
EOSE vs PRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $58.0M | $83.1M |
| Net Profit | $-120.5M | $-31.6M |
| Gross Margin | -93.8% | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | -140.1% | -4.1% |
| Net Margin | -207.7% | -38.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 699.6% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 55.1% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.53 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.0M | $76.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.5M | $83.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $79.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $53.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-31.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-120.5M | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-641.4M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-222.9M | $-19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.1M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-268.1M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -93.8% | 60.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -111.2% | 64.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.2% | 65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -234.7% | 63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -324.0% | 64.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -140.1% | -40.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -200.6% | -27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -419.1% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -506.2% | -39.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -712.8% | -28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -38.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -50.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -207.7% | -39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2102.1% | -25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1463.2% | -24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 144.7% | -35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3696.7% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -48.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.53 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.91 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.20 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.30 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $568.0M | $245.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $813.3M | $51.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-2.2B | $347.7M |
| Total Assets | $885.2M | $487.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $568.0M | $286.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.7M | $294.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.2M | $302.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.6M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.3M | $333.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $196.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $214.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $813.3M | $51.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $448.5M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.3M | $51.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | $51.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $316.9M | $51.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $51.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $347.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.2B | $365.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3B | $380.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1B | $385.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-942.2M | $389.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1B | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $251.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $487.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $885.2M | $508.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $328.2M | $511.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $263.3M | $519.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.3M | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $374.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $374.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-50.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-75.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -129.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 43.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-265.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-50.3M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-65.9M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-66.1M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.9M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-42.7M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-75.2M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.7M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-73.2M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-55.8M | $-33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-16.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -129.7% | -15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -271.1% | -11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -480.2% | -22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -323.6% | -27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -769.1% | -49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -31.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 180.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EOSE
Segment breakdown not available.
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |