vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EMPIRE PETROLEUM CORP (EP) and Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Five Point Holdings, LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.6M vs $7.1M, roughly 1.9× EMPIRE PETROLEUM CORP). Five Point Holdings, LLC runs the higher net margin — -16.4% vs -835.1%, a 818.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Five Point Holdings, LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -30.0%). Over the past eight quarters, EMPIRE PETROLEUM CORP's revenue compounded faster (-13.3% CAGR vs -48.5%).

The Iraq Petroleum Company (IPC), formerly known as the Turkish Petroleum Company (TPC), is an oil company that had a virtual monopoly on all oil exploration and production in Iraq between 1925 and 1961. It was jointly owned by some of the world's largest oil companies and headquartered in London, England.

Five Point Holdings, LLC is a leading U.S. real estate development company that focuses on planning and constructing large-scale master-planned mixed-use communities in high-demand markets across California. Its projects integrate residential housing, commercial office spaces, retail outlets, public amenities and recreational facilities to build vibrant, sustainable living and working environments for local populations.

EP vs FPH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FPH
FPH
1.9× larger
FPH
$13.6M
$7.1M
EP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FPH
FPH
+33.2% gap
FPH
3.2%
-30.0%
EP
Higher net margin
FPH
FPH
818.7% more per $
FPH
-16.4%
-835.1%
EP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EP
EP
Annualised
EP
-13.3%
-48.5%
FPH

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Revenue
$7.1M
$13.6M
Net Profit
$-59.0M
$-2.2M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-834.5%
-43.5%
Net Margin
-835.1%
-16.4%
Revenue YoY
-30.0%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
-1306.0%
-109.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-1.74

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
$13.6M
Q4 25
$7.1M
$75.9M
Q3 25
$9.4M
$13.5M
Q2 25
$8.8M
$7.5M
Q1 25
$9.0M
$13.2M
Q4 24
$10.1M
$159.8M
Q3 24
$11.4M
$17.0M
Q2 24
$12.8M
$51.2M
Net Profit
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
$-2.2M
Q4 25
$-59.0M
$58.7M
Q3 25
$-3.8M
$21.1M
Q2 25
$-5.1M
$3.3M
Q1 25
$-4.2M
$23.3M
Q4 24
$-4.2M
$121.0M
Q3 24
$-3.6M
$4.8M
Q2 24
$-4.4M
$14.7M
Operating Margin
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
-43.5%
Q4 25
-834.5%
89.0%
Q3 25
-37.8%
Q2 25
-56.0%
Q1 25
-43.9%
Q4 24
-38.9%
87.5%
Q3 24
-30.0%
83.6%
Q2 24
-15.0%
86.1%
Net Margin
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
-16.4%
Q4 25
-835.1%
77.3%
Q3 25
-40.9%
156.2%
Q2 25
-57.8%
44.4%
Q1 25
-46.9%
177.0%
Q4 24
-41.6%
75.7%
Q3 24
-32.0%
28.0%
Q2 24
-34.3%
28.8%
EPS (diluted)
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-1.74
Q3 25
$-0.11
Q2 25
$-0.15
Q1 25
$-0.12
Q4 24
$-0.12
Q3 24
$-0.12
Q2 24
$-0.15

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.2M
$332.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-4.6M
$2.3B
Total Assets
$65.9M
$3.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
$332.6M
Q4 25
$1.2M
$425.5M
Q3 25
$4.6M
$351.1M
Q2 25
$2.3M
$456.6M
Q1 25
$1.1M
$528.3M
Q4 24
$2.3M
$430.9M
Q3 24
$3.1M
$224.5M
Q2 24
$9.3M
$217.4M
Total Debt
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
$15.2M
Q2 25
$14.6M
Q1 25
$11.6M
Q4 24
$11.3M
Q3 24
$8.5M
Q2 24
$8.5M
Stockholders' Equity
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
$2.3B
Q4 25
$-4.6M
$2.3B
Q3 25
$53.7M
$2.3B
Q2 25
$54.5M
$2.2B
Q1 25
$59.1M
$2.2B
Q4 24
$62.8M
$2.2B
Q3 24
$56.5M
$2.0B
Q2 24
$58.7M
$2.0B
Total Assets
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
$3.2B
Q4 25
$65.9M
$3.2B
Q3 25
$123.0M
$3.2B
Q2 25
$124.7M
$3.2B
Q1 25
$123.7M
$3.2B
Q4 24
$123.9M
$3.1B
Q3 24
$121.2M
$2.9B
Q2 24
$119.9M
$2.9B
Debt / Equity
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
0.28×
Q2 25
0.27×
Q1 25
0.20×
Q4 24
0.18×
Q3 24
0.15×
Q2 24
0.15×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-2.8M
$-44.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
$-44.5M
Q4 25
$-2.8M
$105.2M
Q3 25
$330.0K
$40.4M
Q2 25
$-3.1M
$-71.6M
Q1 25
$1.6M
$56.7M
Q4 24
$-8.8M
$116.0M
Q3 24
$12.8M
$-18.0M
Q2 24
$-1.8M
$-23.2M
Free Cash Flow
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$105.0M
Q3 25
Q2 25
$-71.7M
Q1 25
$56.7M
Q4 24
$115.2M
Q3 24
$-18.2M
Q2 24
$-23.6M
FCF Margin
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
138.4%
Q3 25
Q2 25
-959.3%
Q1 25
430.9%
Q4 24
72.1%
Q3 24
-106.9%
Q2 24
-46.1%
Capex Intensity
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
0.0%
Q4 25
0.3%
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
0.8%
Q1 25
0.3%
Q4 24
0.5%
Q3 24
1.3%
Q2 24
0.7%
Cash Conversion
EP
EP
FPH
FPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.79×
Q3 25
1.92×
Q2 25
-21.58×
Q1 25
2.44×
Q4 24
0.96×
Q3 24
-3.77×
Q2 24
-1.58×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons