vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and Huntington Bancshares (HBAN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Huntington Bancshares is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.6B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.9× EPAM Systems). Huntington Bancshares runs the higher net margin — 20.2% vs 5.9%, a 14.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Huntington Bancshares posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.0% vs 7.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Huntington Bancshares's revenue compounded faster (168.3% CAGR vs 10.5%).
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated is an American bank holding company headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. Its banking subsidiary, The Huntington National Bank, operates 1,047 banking offices, primarily in the Midwest: 459 in Ohio, 290 in Michigan, 80 in Minnesota, 51 in Pennsylvania, 45 in Indiana, 35 in Illinois, 32 in Colorado, 29 in West Virginia, 16 in Wisconsin, 10 in Kentucky, and one in North Carolina.
EPAM vs HBAN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.6B |
| Net Profit | $82.5M | $523.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | 0.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 20.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.6% | 34.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.52 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $410.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $424.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $377.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $351.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $410.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $362.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $360.0M |
| Q1 26 | $82.5M | $523.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | $519.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.8M | $629.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.0M | $536.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $527.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $530.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | $517.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $474.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 8.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.9% | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 126.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 148.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 142.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 150.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 129.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 142.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 131.7% |
| Q1 26 | $1.52 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.97 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.91 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | $0.34 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.80 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.37 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $165.0M | $23.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.4B | $32.6B |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $285.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | 0.72× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | $165.0M | $23.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $17.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.5B |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | $32.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $24.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $22.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $20.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $20.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $19.5B |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | $285.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $225.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $210.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $207.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $209.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $204.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $200.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $196.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.05× | 0.72× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
