vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lyft, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.1× EPAM Systems). Lyft, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 183.9% vs 5.9%, a 178.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EPAM Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 3.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Lyft, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.3% CAGR vs 10.5%).
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
Lyft, Inc. is an American company offering ride-hailing services, motorized scooters, and bicycle-sharing systems in the United States and Canada, and, via its Free Now mobile app, Europe. Lyft is the second-largest ridesharing company in the United States after Uber. It has 25 million active riders and coordinates 9 million rides per day.
EPAM vs LYFT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $82.5M | $2.8B |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | -12.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 183.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.6% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.3% | 4363.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.52 | $6.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $82.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.8M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.0M | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $61.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 40.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 36.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | 37.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | 39.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | 38.0% |
| Q1 26 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | -12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | -2.1% |
| Q1 26 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 183.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.97 | $6.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.91 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.80 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.37 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $165.0M | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.4B | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $9.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | 0.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $165.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $573.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $979.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $995.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $573.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $732.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $838.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $767.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $655.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $577.6M |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $9.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $5.0B |
| Q1 26 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.74× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $246.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $282.9M | $246.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.7M | $291.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.2M | $343.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $287.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $153.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.0M | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.0M | $276.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.59× | 0.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.76× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | 8.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | 111.89× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | 2.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 55.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.