vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and Northern Trust (NTRS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Northern Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.6× EPAM Systems). Northern Trust runs the higher net margin — 23.7% vs 5.9%, a 17.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Northern Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 7.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Northern Trust's revenue compounded faster (37.8% CAGR vs 10.5%).
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
Northern Trust Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, that caters to corporations, institutional investors, and ultra high net worth individuals. Northern Trust is one of the largest banking institutions in the United States and one of the oldest banks in continuous operation. As of December 31, 2025, it had $1.8 trillion in assets under management and $14.9 trillion in assets under custody.
EPAM vs NTRS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $82.5M | $525.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.9% | 23.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.6% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.3% | 13.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.52 | $2.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $82.5M | $525.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | $466.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.8M | $457.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.0M | $421.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $392.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $455.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | $464.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $896.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 49.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 45.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 43.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 50.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.9% | 23.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 32.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 37.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 38.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 76.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.52 | $2.71 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.97 | $2.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.91 | $2.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | $1.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.80 | $2.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.37 | $2.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $4.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $165.0M | $2.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.4B | $13.0B |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $174.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | $165.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | $13.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $13.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $12.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $12.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $12.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $12.7B |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | $174.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $177.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $170.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $171.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $165.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $155.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $155.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $156.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.05× | 0.22× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPAM
Segment breakdown not available.
NTRS
| Trust, Investment and Other Servicing Fees | $1.3B | 61% |
| Other | $871.8M | 39% |
