vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and NEWELL BRANDS INC. (NWL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEWELL BRANDS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.3× EPAM Systems). EPAM Systems runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs -16.6%, a 24.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EPAM Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs -2.7%). EPAM Systems produced more free cash flow last quarter ($268.1M vs $91.0M). Over the past eight quarters, EPAM Systems's revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs 7.1%).
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
Newell Brands Inc. is an American conglomerate of consumer and commercial products. The company's brands and products include Rubbermaid storage/or waste disposal containers; home organization and reusable container products; Contigo and Bubba water bottles; Coleman outdoor products; writing instruments glue ; children's products ; cookware and small appliances and fragrance products.
EPAM vs NWL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $109.4M | $-315.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | -14.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | -16.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.8% | -2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | -483.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.97 | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | $-315.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.8M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.0M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $-54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | $-198.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | 34.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | 30.5% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | -14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | -2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | -0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.97 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.91 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.80 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.37 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.97 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $203.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $10.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $229.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $219.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $494.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $382.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $372.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $3.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $12.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $12.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $282.9M | $161.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $268.1M | $91.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.0% | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $612.7M | $17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $282.9M | $161.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.7M | $374.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.2M | $-58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $-213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.0M | $282.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.0M | $32.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.9M | $32.0M |
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | $91.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.4M | $315.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.4M | $-117.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | $-272.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.5M | $54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.0M | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.2M | $-27.0M |
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | -17.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.76× | 17.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPAM
Segment breakdown not available.
NWL
| Kitchen | $538.0M | 28% |
| Writing | $370.0M | 20% |
| Commercial | $320.0M | 17% |
| Financial Institution Two | $286.0M | 15% |
| Baby | $259.0M | 14% |
| Outdoor And Recreation | $142.0M | 7% |
