vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and QXO, Inc. (QXO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
QXO, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.6× EPAM Systems). EPAM Systems runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs -4.1%, a 11.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, QXO, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14782.6% vs 12.8%).
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
Brad Jacobs is an American businessman who is chairman and CEO of QXO, Inc.
EPAM vs QXO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $109.4M | $-90.3M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | -3.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | -4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.8% | 14782.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | -899.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.97 | $-0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | $-90.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.8M | $-139.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.0M | $-58.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.97 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.91 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.80 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.37 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.97 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $9.7B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $15.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $15.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $17.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $282.9M | $186.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $268.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $612.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $282.9M | $186.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.7M | $212.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.2M | $-174.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.4M | $182.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.76× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
