vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and RANGE RESOURCES CORP (RRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EPAM Systems is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $786.9M, roughly 1.8× RANGE RESOURCES CORP). RANGE RESOURCES CORP runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 7.8%, a 15.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RANGE RESOURCES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.0% vs 12.8%). Over the past eight quarters, RANGE RESOURCES CORP's revenue compounded faster (14.6% CAGR vs 9.9%).
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
Range Resources Corporation is a natural gas exploration and production company, the headquartered is in Fort Worth, Texas. It operates in the Marcellus Formation, where it is the largest land owners.
EPAM vs RRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $786.9M |
| Net Profit | $109.4M | $179.1M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 94.5% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.8% | 18.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | 88.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.97 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $786.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $655.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $699.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $846.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $667.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $513.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $598.8M |
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | $179.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.8M | $144.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.0M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $94.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $92.1M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 94.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 92.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 95.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | 93.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | 93.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | 94.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | 93.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | 94.7% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.97 | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.91 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.80 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.37 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.97 | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $204.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $204.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $175.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $134.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $344.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $304.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $277.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $251.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $343.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $282.9M | $257.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $268.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.59× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $612.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $282.9M | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.7M | $247.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.2M | $336.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $330.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $217.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.0M | $245.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.0M | $148.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.9M | $331.9M |
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.59× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.76× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | 3.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | 2.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.77× | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 5.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 3.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPAM
Segment breakdown not available.
RRC
| Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquids And Oil Sales | $745.5M | 95% |
| Brokered Natural Gas And Marketing | $41.3M | 5% |
