vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EPAM Systems (EPAM) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.3× EPAM Systems). Williams-Sonoma, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 7.8%, a 5.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EPAM Systems posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs 4.6%). EPAM Systems produced more free cash flow last quarter ($268.1M vs $248.1M). Over the past eight quarters, EPAM Systems's revenue compounded faster (9.9% CAGR vs -9.1%).
EPAM Systems, Inc. is an American company that specializes in software engineering services, digital platform engineering, and digital product design, operating out of Newtown, Pennsylvania. EPAM is a founding member of the MACH Alliance.
Williams Sonoma is an American retailer of cookware, appliances, and home furnishings. It is owned by Williams-Sonoma, Inc., and was founded by Charles E. (Chuck) Williams in 1956.
EPAM vs WSM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $109.4M | $241.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.1% | 46.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 7.8% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.8% | 4.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | -3.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.97 | $1.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $109.4M | $241.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.8M | $247.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.0M | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.5M | $384.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $103.3M | $249.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.3M | $225.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.6M | $265.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $354.4M |
| Q4 25 | 30.1% | 46.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 44.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.9% | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.3% | 48.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.4% | 46.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.4% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 20.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 20.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 15.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.97 | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.91 | $2.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.56 | $1.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | $1.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.80 | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.37 | $1.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.70 | $4.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.97 | $5.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $884.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $5.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $884.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $985.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $826.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $5.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $282.9M | $316.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $268.1M | $248.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.0% | 13.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.59× | 1.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $612.7M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $282.9M | $316.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.7M | $282.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.2M | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $633.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.3M | $253.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $242.0M | $246.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.0M | $226.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.9M | $674.9M |
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | $248.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.4M | $230.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.4M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | $566.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.5M | $170.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.0M | $215.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.3M | $187.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.2M | $621.2M |
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.5% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 27.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.59× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.76× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.33× | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.26× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.77× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 1.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
