vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE Co (EPC) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $422.8M, roughly 1.3× EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE Co). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs -15.5%, a 43.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -11.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs -16.0%).

The Edgewell Personal Care Company is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut. It was formed in 2015 following the corporate spin-off from Energizer Holdings, Inc..

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

EPC vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.3× larger
KIM
$542.5M
$422.8M
EPC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+14.9% gap
KIM
3.2%
-11.6%
EPC
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
43.4% more per $
KIM
27.9%
-15.5%
EPC
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
3.8%
-16.0%
EPC

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$422.8M
$542.5M
Net Profit
$-65.7M
$151.2M
Gross Margin
38.1%
Operating Margin
-4.5%
36.4%
Net Margin
-15.5%
27.9%
Revenue YoY
-11.6%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
-3028.6%
-9.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-1.41

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$422.8M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$600.5M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$627.2M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$580.7M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$415.1M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$517.6M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$647.8M
$500.2M
Q1 24
$599.4M
$503.8M
Net Profit
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$-65.7M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$-30.6M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$29.1M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$29.0M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$-2.1M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$8.8M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$49.0M
$119.7M
Q1 24
$36.0M
$-11.0M
Gross Margin
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
38.1%
Q3 25
37.9%
Q2 25
42.8%
Q1 25
44.1%
Q4 24
41.6%
Q3 24
41.1%
Q2 24
44.3%
Q1 24
43.1%
Operating Margin
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
-4.5%
36.4%
Q3 25
-4.2%
34.9%
Q2 25
8.6%
39.2%
Q1 25
10.1%
33.6%
Q4 24
2.2%
31.7%
Q3 24
3.9%
33.7%
Q2 24
12.8%
32.1%
Q1 24
11.7%
25.9%
Net Margin
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
-15.5%
27.9%
Q3 25
-5.1%
25.7%
Q2 25
4.6%
31.0%
Q1 25
5.0%
24.8%
Q4 24
-0.5%
31.6%
Q3 24
1.7%
26.8%
Q2 24
7.6%
23.9%
Q1 24
6.0%
-2.2%
EPS (diluted)
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$-1.41
Q3 25
$-0.65
Q2 25
$0.62
Q1 25
$0.60
Q4 24
$-0.04
Q3 24
$0.18
Q2 24
$0.98
Q1 24
$0.72

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.5B
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
$10.4B
Total Assets
$3.8B
$19.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.03×
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$211.6M
Q3 25
$159.3M
Q2 25
$226.6M
Q1 25
$131.3M
Q4 24
$688.6M
Q3 24
$209.1M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
Q1 24
$133.4M
Total Debt
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$1.5B
$7.7B
Q3 25
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.4B
Q1 25
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.4B
$8.0B
Q3 24
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.3B
Q1 24
$1.4B
Stockholders' Equity
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$1.5B
$10.4B
Q3 25
$1.6B
$10.5B
Q2 25
$1.6B
$10.5B
Q1 25
$1.5B
$10.6B
Q4 24
$1.5B
$10.7B
Q3 24
$1.6B
$10.5B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$10.6B
Q1 24
$1.6B
$10.6B
Total Assets
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$3.8B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$3.8B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$3.8B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$3.8B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$3.7B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$3.7B
$19.5B
Q1 24
$3.8B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
1.03×
0.74×
Q3 25
0.89×
Q2 25
0.88×
Q1 25
0.95×
Q4 24
0.97×
0.75×
Q3 24
0.81×
Q2 24
0.82×
Q1 24
0.88×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-125.9M
$258.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-137.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-32.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.7%
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$36.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$-125.9M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$74.1M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$114.8M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$45.1M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$-115.6M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$-388.3M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$101.2M
$294.1M
Q1 24
$129.0M
$176.1M
Free Cash Flow
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
$-137.5M
Q3 25
$46.5M
Q2 25
$99.3M
Q1 25
$28.0M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$-132.4M
Q3 24
$-414.2M
Q2 24
$88.6M
Q1 24
$117.5M
FCF Margin
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
-32.5%
Q3 25
7.7%
Q2 25
15.8%
Q1 25
4.8%
38.3%
Q4 24
-31.9%
Q3 24
-80.0%
Q2 24
13.7%
Q1 24
19.6%
Capex Intensity
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
2.7%
0.0%
Q3 25
4.6%
0.0%
Q2 25
2.5%
0.0%
Q1 25
2.9%
3.4%
Q4 24
4.0%
Q3 24
5.0%
Q2 24
1.9%
Q1 24
1.9%
Cash Conversion
EPC
EPC
KIM
KIM
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
3.95×
1.87×
Q1 25
1.56×
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
-44.13×
2.18×
Q2 24
2.07×
2.46×
Q1 24
3.58×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EPC
EPC

Other$242.0M57%
Sunand Skin Care Segment$131.5M31%
Shavinggelsandcreams$32.3M8%
Wipes And Other Skin Care Products$17.0M4%

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons