vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P. (EPD) and HSBC HOLDINGS PLC (HSBC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($28.6B vs $14.4B, roughly 2.0× ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.). HSBC HOLDINGS PLC runs the higher net margin — 25.7% vs 10.4%, a 15.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. HSBC HOLDINGS PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($64.0B vs $1.9B).
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is an American midstream natural gas and crude oil pipeline company with headquarters in Houston, Texas. It acquired GulfTerra in September 2004. The company ranked No. 105 in the 2018 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue. Dan Duncan was the majority owner until his death in 2010.
HSBC Holdings plc is a British universal bank and financial services group headquartered in London, England, with historical and business links to East Asia and a multinational footprint. It is the largest Europe-based bank by total assets, ahead of BNP Paribas, with US$3.098 trillion as of September 2024. This also puts it as the 7th largest bank in the world by total assets behind Bank of America, and the 3rd largest non-state owned bank in the world.
EPD vs HSBC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.4B | $28.6B |
| Net Profit | $1.5B | $7.3B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 33.1% |
| Net Margin | 10.4% | 25.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -72.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $14.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4B | $28.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.4% | 33.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 25.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $434.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $192.3B |
| Total Assets | — | $3017.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $969.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $206.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $870.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $220.0M | $434.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $583.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $192.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $77.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.4B | $3017.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.6B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $65.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.9B | $64.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.4% | 223.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 4.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 8.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $65.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $762.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $64.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $898.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $310.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 223.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.66× | 8.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.