vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP (EPM) and R F INDUSTRIES LTD (RFIL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
R F INDUSTRIES LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.7M vs $20.7M, roughly 1.1× EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP). EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs 0.8%, a 4.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, R F INDUSTRIES LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.9% vs 2.0%). Over the past eight quarters, R F INDUSTRIES LTD's revenue compounded faster (29.8% CAGR vs -5.2%).
Tootsie Roll Industries is an American manufacturer of confectionery based in Chicago, Illinois. Its best-known products include the namesake Tootsie Rolls and Tootsie Pops. Tootsie Roll Industries currently markets its brands internationally in Canada, Mexico, and over 75 other countries.
EPM vs RFIL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.7M | $22.7M |
| Net Profit | $1.1M | $173.0K |
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 4.0% |
| Net Margin | 5.2% | 0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.0% | 22.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 158.4% | 172.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.3M | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.6M | $19.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.9M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.2M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.0M | $13.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | $173.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $824.0K | $392.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $-245.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | $-245.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.8M | $-238.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $-705.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $289.0K | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | 44.3% | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.5% | 34.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.1% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.7% | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.2% | 29.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.3% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.2% | 24.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | -2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | -15.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.0% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | -26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | -10.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.8M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $67.5M | $35.2M |
| Total Assets | $169.3M | $73.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $714.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.7M | $839.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | $67.5M | $35.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.1M | $34.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.8M | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.7M | $34.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.3M | $34.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $34.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.5M | $38.7M |
| Q4 25 | $169.3M | $73.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $73.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $160.3M | $72.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.4M | $70.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.2M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.9M | $71.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.9M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.5M | $79.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $2.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.09× | 12.13× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $4.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8M | $-311.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $601.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7M | $-244.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $197.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $840.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-419.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $574.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-418.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $697.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.09× | 12.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.47× | -0.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.64× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPM
| Crude Oil | $10.7M | 52% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $7.4M | 36% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $2.5M | 12% |
RFIL
| US | $20.9M | 92% |
| Non Us | $1.8M | 8% |