vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. (EPRT) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $158.8M, roughly 1.7× ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC.). ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. runs the higher net margin — 37.8% vs 0.7%, a 37.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.8% vs -16.5%).
Essential Properties Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that acquires, owns and manages a diversified portfolio of single-tenant net-leased commercial properties across the United States. Its assets primarily cover essential service-oriented sectors including casual dining, automotive services, medical clinics, early childhood education centers and light industrial facilities, with tenants mostly holding robust long-term operating track records.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
EPRT vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $158.8M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $60.0M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 56.5% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 37.8% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.8% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.5% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.28 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $158.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.9M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.1M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.4M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.3M | $305.7M |
| Q1 26 | $60.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.1M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.5M | $25.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.1% |
| Q1 26 | 56.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.9% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.1% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.6% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.1% | -9.0% |
| Q1 26 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.1% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.1% | 8.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.34 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.32 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.2M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.4B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $7.2B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $60.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.0M | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.6M | $802.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $82.1M |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $740.1M |
| Q1 26 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.60× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.59× | 0.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $381.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.8M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.2M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $-39.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-49.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.60× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.57× | -1.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPRT
| Rental revenue 1,2 | $149.4M | 94% |
| Other | $8.6M | 5% |
| Other revenue | $779.0K | 0% |
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
