vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. (EPRT) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($158.8M vs $137.0M, roughly 1.2× STRATASYS LTD.). ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. runs the higher net margin — 37.8% vs -40.6%, a 78.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.8% vs -2.2%). Over the past eight quarters, ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (20.6% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Essential Properties Realty Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that acquires, owns and manages a diversified portfolio of single-tenant net-leased commercial properties across the United States. Its assets primarily cover essential service-oriented sectors including casual dining, automotive services, medical clinics, early childhood education centers and light industrial facilities, with tenants mostly holding robust long-term operating track records.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
EPRT vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $158.8M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $60.0M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 56.5% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | 37.8% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.8% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.5% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.28 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $158.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.9M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.1M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $129.4M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.1M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.3M | $138.0M |
| Q1 26 | $60.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.6M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.2M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.1M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.1M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.5M | $-25.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% |
| Q1 26 | 56.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.7% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 64.1% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.6% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.7% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.1% | -18.9% |
| Q1 26 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.3% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.1% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.0% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.1% | -18.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.2M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.4B | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $7.2B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $60.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.8M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.8M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.0M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.7M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.6M | $70.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $850.5M |
| Q1 26 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.59× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $381.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.8M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.2M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $308.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.5M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.1M | $-2.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.60× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.57× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EPRT
| Rental revenue 1,2 | $149.4M | 94% |
| Other | $8.6M | 5% |
| Other revenue | $779.0K | 0% |
SSYS
Segment breakdown not available.
