vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EQUITY BANCSHARES INC (EQBK) and RxSight, Inc. (RXST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EQUITY BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($63.5M vs $32.6M, roughly 1.9× RxSight, Inc.). EQUITY BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 34.8% vs -28.1%, a 62.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EQUITY BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.4% vs -18.9%). EQUITY BANCSHARES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($38.1M vs $-2.3M). Over the past eight quarters, EQUITY BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 5.1%).
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Houston, Texas with operations in Texas and central Oklahoma. As of December 31, 2019, the company operated 285 branches: 65 in the Houston area, including The Woodlands, Texas; 30 in South Texas, including Corpus Christi, Texas and Victoria, Texas; 75 in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex; 22 in East Texas; 29 in Central Texas, including Austin, Texas and San Antonio; 34 in West Texas, including Lubbock, Texas, Midland–Odess...
RxSight, Inc. is a medical technology company focused on developing and commercializing innovative intraocular lens solutions for patients undergoing cataract and refractive lens exchange procedures. Its flagship Light Adjustable Lens allows post-surgery power adjustment via a dedicated light delivery device, serving global ophthalmology care markets to improve post-operative visual outcomes for patients.
EQBK vs RXST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $63.5M | $32.6M |
| Net Profit | $22.1M | $-9.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.5% |
| Operating Margin | 41.7% | -34.8% |
| Net Margin | 34.8% | -28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.4% | -18.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.0% | -54.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $63.5M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.0M | $30.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.4M | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.3M | $40.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.3M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.9M | $29.5M |
| Q4 25 | $22.1M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-29.7M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.9M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.1M | $-9.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 74.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 70.1% |
| Q4 25 | 41.7% | -34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -207.2% | -40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.5% | -41.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.1% | -28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.0% | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.1% | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.4% | -23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.8% | -36.2% |
| Q4 25 | 34.8% | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -164.7% | -32.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.1% | -35.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | -21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | -17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.2% | -30.8% |
| Q4 25 | $1.07 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.55 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.85 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.06 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.28 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.90 | $-0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $228.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $443.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $732.1M | $275.7M |
| Total Assets | $6.4B | $311.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $228.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $227.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $227.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $229.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $237.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $237.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $233.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $125.4M |
| Q4 25 | $443.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $486.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $448.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $376.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $437.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $391.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $367.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $732.1M | $275.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $711.9M | $276.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.6M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $617.3M | $279.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.9M | $281.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $504.0M | $277.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $461.4M | $275.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $456.8M | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $311.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $308.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $309.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $313.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $318.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $310.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | $305.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2B | $183.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.80× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $51.4M | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $38.1M | $-2.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 60.0% | -6.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.9% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.33× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $88.8M | $-19.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.3M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.7M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.8M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.5M | $650.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.6M | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $38.1M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.2M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.4M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $-453.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.2M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6M | $-11.3M |
| Q4 25 | 60.0% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.7% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.5% | -17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | -24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 112.1% | -12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.4% | -15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.0% | -38.2% |
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.90× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EQBK
Segment breakdown not available.
RXST
| Rxlal | $28.2M | 86% |
| LDD | $3.0M | 9% |
| Service Warranty Service Contracts And Accessories | $1.5M | 4% |
