vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EQUINOR ASA (EQNR) and JBS N.V. (JBS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EQUINOR ASA is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0B vs $22.6B, roughly 1.2× JBS N.V.). JBS N.V. runs the higher net margin — 2.9% vs -0.8%, a 3.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBS N.V. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.4% vs 2.4%).
Equinor ASA is a Norwegian multinational energy company headquartered in Stavanger, Norway. It is primarily a petroleum company operating in 36 countries with additional investments in renewable energy and lithium mining. In the 2020 Forbes Global 2000, Equinor was ranked as the 169th-largest public company in the world. In 2023, the company was ranked 52nd in the same list. As of 2021, the company has 21,126 employees.
JBS N.V. is a Brazilian multinational company that is the largest meat processing enterprise in the world, producing factory processed beef, chicken, salmon, sheep, pork, and also selling by-products from the processing of these meats. It is headquartered in São Paulo. It was founded in 1953 in Anápolis, Goiás.
EQNR vs JBS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0B | $22.6B |
| Net Profit | $-204.0M | $644.1M |
| Gross Margin | 46.6% | 13.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 5.4% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 2.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.4% | 13.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -108.9% | -14.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $0.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $26.0B | $22.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.4B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 22 | $36.5B | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $36.4B | — |
| Q3 25 | $-204.0M | $644.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $756.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $4.7B | — |
| Q3 25 | 46.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 22 | 62.0% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 62.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | 20.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 22 | 48.6% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 50.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | -0.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 22 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 13.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $0.52 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.62 | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.11 | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $1.46 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.1B | $485.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $213.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $40.6B | $9.5B |
| Total Assets | $135.8B | $44.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | $485.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 22 | $20.6B | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $213.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $40.6B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.4B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 22 | $41.2B | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $135.8B | $44.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $152.0B | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3B | $996.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-264.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $996.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q1 22 | $15.8B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-264.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.84× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q1 22 | 3.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
