vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Equinox Gold Corp. (EQX) and HECLA MINING CO (HL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HECLA MINING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($448.1M vs $575.0K, roughly 779.3× Equinox Gold Corp.). HECLA MINING CO runs the higher net margin — 30.0% vs 4.9%, a 25.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Barrick Mining Corporation is a mining company that produces gold and copper. It has mining operations and projects in Argentina, Canada, Chile, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Jamaica, Mali, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Tanzania, the United States and Zambia. In 2024, it produced 3.91 million ounces of gold at all-in sustaining costs of $1,484/ounce and 195,000 tonnes of copper at all-in sustaining costs of $3.45/pound. As of ...
Hecla Mining is a leading U.S.-based precious and base metals mining firm. Core products include silver, gold, lead and zinc, with operating assets across North America. It supplies raw materials to global jewelry manufacturing, industrial production, and renewable energy segments, and is a top domestic primary silver producer.
EQX vs HL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $575.0K | $448.1M |
| Net Profit | $28.3K | $134.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 49.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | 30.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 79.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 1027.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.17 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $448.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $409.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $261.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $575.0K | $249.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $245.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $245.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $189.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $134.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $100.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.3K | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $301.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | — | $3.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $301.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $296.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $80.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $217.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $134.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 30.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 18.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $310.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $217.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $148.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $161.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $78.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $134.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $90.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-690.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-30.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.82× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EQX
Segment breakdown not available.
HL
| Silver Contracts | $258.5M | 58% |
| Gold | $129.2M | 29% |
| Zinc | $30.3M | 7% |
| Lead | $23.3M | 5% |
| Environmental Remediation Services | $9.2M | 2% |
