vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Eversource Energy (ES) and Exelon (EXC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Exelon is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $3.4B, roughly 1.6× Eversource Energy). On growth, Eversource Energy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.4% vs -19.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Eversource Energy's revenue compounded faster (0.6% CAGR vs 0.5%).
Eversource Energy is a publicly traded, Fortune 500 energy company headquartered in Springfield, Massachusetts with additional corporate offices in Hartford, Connecticut, and Boston, Massachusetts, with several regulated subsidiaries offering retail electricity, natural gas service and water service to approximately 4 million customers in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire.
Exelon Corporation is an American public utility headquartered in Chicago, and incorporated in Pennsylvania. Exelon is the largest electric parent company in the United States by revenue and is the largest regulated electric utility in the United States with approximately 10 million customers. The company is ranked 187th on the Fortune 500.
ES vs EXC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.4B | $5.4B |
| Net Profit | $423.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 21.1% | 21.9% |
| Net Margin | 12.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | -19.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 468.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $6.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $423.2M | $594.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.4M | $875.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $354.6M | $391.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $552.7M | $908.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.4M | $647.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-116.2M | $707.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.2M | $448.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.1% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.8% | 17.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.4% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.3% | 8.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.99 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.96 | $0.39 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.50 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.95 | $0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $135.4M | $626.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $49.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $16.2B | $28.8B |
| Total Assets | $63.8B | $116.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.72× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q1 26 | — | $626.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $135.4M | $626.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $343.7M | $724.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.9M | $616.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $934.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $49.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $49.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $28.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.2B | $28.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0B | $28.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.7B | $27.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3B | $27.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0B | $26.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $26.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $116.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.8B | $116.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.7B | $113.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.0B | $111.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.2B | $109.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.6B | $107.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6B | $106.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.4B | $105.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $916.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-67.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 29.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 2.16× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-45.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $916.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $642.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $555.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $670.7M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-67.3M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.3M | $163.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $-502.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.2M | $-746.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-546.5M | $-510.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-515.4M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-400.8M | $-237.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.0% | -22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.4% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.8% | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.8% | -4.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.2% | 45.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.0% | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.7% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.5% | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.0% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.3% | 31.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.16× | 2.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.98× | 2.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.98× | 3.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.88× | 1.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.63× | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.99× | 3.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ES
| Residential | $1.2B | 35% |
| Commercial | $789.0M | 23% |
| Eversource Electric Transmission | $573.8M | 17% |
| Wholesale Transmission Revenue | $570.0M | 17% |
| Industrial | $102.6M | 3% |
| Water Distribution Segment | $58.4M | 2% |
| Eversource Water | $56.3M | 2% |
| Other Revenue Adjustmentsfrom Contractswith Customers | $25.9M | 1% |
EXC
Segment breakdown not available.
