vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Eversource Energy (ES) and Packaging Corporation of America (PKG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Eversource Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4B vs $2.4B, roughly 1.4× Packaging Corporation of America). Eversource Energy runs the higher net margin — 12.6% vs 7.2%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Eversource Energy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.4% vs 10.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Packaging Corporation of America's revenue compounded faster (6.8% CAGR vs 0.6%).

Eversource Energy is a publicly traded, Fortune 500 energy company headquartered in Springfield, Massachusetts with additional corporate offices in Hartford, Connecticut, and Boston, Massachusetts, with several regulated subsidiaries offering retail electricity, natural gas service and water service to approximately 4 million customers in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire.

Packaging Corporation of America is an American manufacturing company based in Lake Forest, Illinois. The company has about 15,500 employees, with operations primarily in the United States. The CEO is Mark W. Kowlzan.

ES vs PKG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ES
ES
1.4× larger
ES
$3.4B
$2.4B
PKG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ES
ES
+2.8% gap
ES
13.4%
10.6%
PKG
Higher net margin
ES
ES
5.3% more per $
ES
12.6%
7.2%
PKG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PKG
PKG
Annualised
PKG
6.8%
0.6%
ES

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Revenue
$3.4B
$2.4B
Net Profit
$423.2M
$170.9M
Gross Margin
19.1%
Operating Margin
21.1%
10.6%
Net Margin
12.6%
7.2%
Revenue YoY
13.4%
10.6%
Net Profit YoY
468.8%
-16.1%
EPS (diluted)
$1.11
$1.91

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
$2.4B
Q4 25
$3.4B
$2.4B
Q3 25
$3.2B
$2.3B
Q2 25
$2.8B
$2.2B
Q1 25
$4.1B
$2.1B
Q4 24
$3.0B
$2.1B
Q3 24
$3.1B
$2.2B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$2.1B
Net Profit
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
$170.9M
Q4 25
$423.2M
$101.9M
Q3 25
$369.4M
$226.9M
Q2 25
$354.6M
$241.5M
Q1 25
$552.7M
$203.8M
Q4 24
$74.4M
$221.2M
Q3 24
$-116.2M
$238.1M
Q2 24
$337.2M
$198.9M
Gross Margin
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
19.1%
Q4 25
18.9%
Q3 25
21.8%
Q2 25
22.2%
Q1 25
21.2%
Q4 24
21.9%
Q3 24
23.1%
Q2 24
21.1%
Operating Margin
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
10.6%
Q4 25
21.1%
7.1%
Q3 25
21.4%
14.0%
Q2 25
23.4%
15.4%
Q1 25
22.5%
13.1%
Q4 24
11.7%
14.1%
Q3 24
20.0%
15.0%
Q2 24
23.8%
13.3%
Net Margin
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
7.2%
Q4 25
12.6%
4.3%
Q3 25
11.5%
9.8%
Q2 25
12.5%
11.1%
Q1 25
13.4%
9.5%
Q4 24
2.5%
10.3%
Q3 24
-3.8%
10.9%
Q2 24
13.3%
9.6%
EPS (diluted)
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
$1.91
Q4 25
$1.11
$1.14
Q3 25
$0.99
$2.51
Q2 25
$0.96
$2.67
Q1 25
$1.50
$2.26
Q4 24
$0.16
$2.45
Q3 24
$-0.33
$2.64
Q2 24
$0.95
$2.21

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$135.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$16.2B
Total Assets
$63.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$135.4M
$529.0M
Q3 25
$259.3M
$634.0M
Q2 25
$343.7M
$787.9M
Q1 25
$111.4M
$751.7M
Q4 24
$26.7M
$685.0M
Q3 24
$97.9M
$676.6M
Q2 24
$613.6M
Total Debt
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$4.0B
Q3 25
$4.0B
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$2.5B
Q3 24
$2.5B
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$16.2B
$4.6B
Q3 25
$16.0B
$4.8B
Q2 25
$15.7B
$4.6B
Q1 25
$15.3B
$4.5B
Q4 24
$15.0B
$4.4B
Q3 24
$15.0B
$4.3B
Q2 24
$14.8B
$4.1B
Total Assets
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$63.8B
$10.7B
Q3 25
$61.7B
$11.0B
Q2 25
$61.0B
$9.0B
Q1 25
$60.2B
$9.0B
Q4 24
$59.6B
$8.8B
Q3 24
$58.6B
$8.8B
Q2 24
$58.4B
$9.0B
Debt / Equity
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.87×
Q3 25
0.84×
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.57×
Q3 24
0.58×
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$916.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-67.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-2.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
29.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.16×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-45.1M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$916.1M
$446.6M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$472.2M
Q2 25
$1.1B
$299.6M
Q1 25
$1.0B
$339.1M
Q4 24
$642.1M
$325.4M
Q3 24
$555.6M
$327.1M
Q2 24
$670.7M
$278.3M
Free Cash Flow
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-67.3M
$127.6M
Q3 25
$-26.3M
$280.1M
Q2 25
$15.3M
$129.9M
Q1 25
$33.2M
$191.0M
Q4 24
$-546.5M
$124.1M
Q3 24
$-515.4M
$180.4M
Q2 24
$-400.8M
$33.3M
FCF Margin
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
-2.0%
5.4%
Q3 25
-0.8%
12.1%
Q2 25
0.5%
6.0%
Q1 25
0.8%
8.9%
Q4 24
-18.4%
5.8%
Q3 24
-16.8%
8.3%
Q2 24
-15.8%
1.6%
Capex Intensity
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
29.2%
13.5%
Q3 25
35.0%
8.3%
Q2 25
36.7%
7.8%
Q1 25
24.5%
6.9%
Q4 24
40.0%
9.4%
Q3 24
35.0%
6.7%
Q2 24
42.3%
11.8%
Cash Conversion
ES
ES
PKG
PKG
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.16×
4.38×
Q3 25
2.98×
2.08×
Q2 25
2.98×
1.24×
Q1 25
1.88×
1.66×
Q4 24
8.63×
1.47×
Q3 24
1.37×
Q2 24
1.99×
1.40×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ES
ES

Residential$1.2B35%
Commercial$789.0M23%
Eversource Electric Transmission$573.8M17%
Wholesale Transmission Revenue$570.0M17%
Industrial$102.6M3%
Water Distribution Segment$58.4M2%
Eversource Water$56.3M2%
Other Revenue Adjustmentsfrom Contractswith Customers$25.9M1%

PKG
PKG

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons