vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESAB Corp (ESAB) and Global Payments (GPN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Global Payments is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0B vs $745.6M, roughly 4.0× ESAB Corp). ESAB Corp runs the higher net margin — 6.6% vs -59.9%, a 66.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Global Payments posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (63.1% vs 9.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Global Payments's revenue compounded faster (7.5% CAGR vs 4.0%).
ESAB, Elektriska Svetsnings-Aktiebolaget, is an American-Swedish industrial company.
Global Payments Inc. is an American multinational financial technology company that provides payment technology and services to merchants, issuers and consumers. In June 2021, the company was named to the Fortune 500. The company processes payments made through credit cards, debit cards, and digital and contactless payments.
ESAB vs GPN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $745.6M | $3.0B |
| Net Profit | $49.2M | $-1.8B |
| Gross Margin | 36.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 12.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.6% | -59.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.9% | 63.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.3% | -688.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | $-6.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $745.6M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $727.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $715.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $678.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $673.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $707.1M | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | $49.2M | $-1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $217.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.9M | $635.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.4M | $241.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $305.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.7M | $567.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.2M | $315.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.9M | $374.8M |
| Q1 26 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.0% | 89.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.6% | 74.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | 62.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.7% | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.2% | 63.5% |
| Q1 26 | 12.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 22.3% |
| Q1 26 | 6.6% | -59.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.9% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 14.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.78 | $-6.59 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.90 | $0.91 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.09 | $2.64 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.10 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.87 | $2.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.11 | $1.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.35 | $1.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $5.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | $22.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $24.5B |
| Total Assets | $5.6B | $64.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.91× | 0.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.2M | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.2M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $291.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.4M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.7M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $228.5M | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | $22.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $19.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $14.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $15.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $15.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $15.6B |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | $24.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $22.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $22.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $22.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $22.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $22.4B |
| Q1 26 | $5.6B | $64.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $53.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $48.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $48.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $47.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $46.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $50.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $50.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.91× | 0.92× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.60× | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | 0.70× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.95× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $46.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.5M | $515.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.6M | $768.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.4M | $817.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $555.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.9M | $653.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | $736.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $70.3M | $347.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.4M | $598.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | $665.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $427.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.2M | $469.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.0M | $557.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.2% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 18.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | 60.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 21.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | 2.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | 3.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.36× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.48× | 5.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.00× | 1.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
