vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESAB Corp (ESAB) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ESAB Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($745.6M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.4× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 6.6%, a 21.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ESAB Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.9% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, ESAB Corp's revenue compounded faster (4.0% CAGR vs 3.8%).
ESAB, Elektriska Svetsnings-Aktiebolaget, is an American-Swedish industrial company.
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
ESAB vs KIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $745.6M | $542.5M |
| Net Profit | $49.2M | $151.2M |
| Gross Margin | 36.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 36.4% |
| Net Margin | 6.6% | 27.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.9% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.3% | -9.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $745.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $727.8M | $542.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $715.6M | $535.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $678.1M | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $536.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | $525.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $673.3M | $507.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $707.1M | $500.2M |
| Q1 26 | $49.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.9M | $137.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.4M | $163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.7M | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.2M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.9M | $119.7M |
| Q1 26 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 32.1% |
| Q1 26 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.9% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 23.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.90 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.11 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.35 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $211.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | $7.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $5.6B | $19.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.91× | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.2M | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.2M | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $291.3M | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.4M | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.7M | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $228.5M | $126.4M |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $10.6B |
| Q1 26 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $19.5B |
| Q1 26 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.60× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $46.9M | $258.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.95× | 1.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $46.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.5M | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.6M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.4M | $305.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.9M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | $294.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $70.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.36× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.48× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.00× | 2.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
