vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESAB Corp (ESAB) and PLEXUS CORP (PLXS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PLEXUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $727.8M, roughly 1.6× ESAB Corp). ESAB Corp runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs 4.3%, a 3.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PLEXUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 8.5%). Over the past eight quarters, PLEXUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs 2.8%).
ESAB, Elektriska Svetsnings-Aktiebolaget, is an American-Swedish industrial company.
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
ESAB vs PLXS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $727.8M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $54.8M | $49.8M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 10.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.5% | 18.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.1% | 27.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.90 | $1.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $727.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $715.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $678.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $670.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $673.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $707.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $689.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $41.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $54.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $53.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $60.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.51 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.90 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.11 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.35 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $218.2M | $303.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $248.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $291.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $228.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $992.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.61× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $81.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $70.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.49× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $238.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $70.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.74× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESAB
| Consumable Products | $477.9M | 66% |
| Equipment Products | $249.9M | 34% |
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $652.0M | 56% |
| Americas | $397.0M | 34% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $116.0M | 10% |
