vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Empire State Realty OP, L.P. (ESBA) and Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. (KGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($332.9M vs $199.2M, roughly 1.7× Empire State Realty OP, L.P.). Empire State Realty OP, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 16.1% vs 7.4%, a 8.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.5% vs 0.8%). Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($142.0M vs $50.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.3% CAGR vs 4.9%).

Empire State Realty OP, L.P. is a real estate operating partnership focused on owning, managing, and leasing premium commercial and retail properties primarily in the New York City metropolitan area. Its portfolio includes iconic landmarks like the Empire State Building, serving corporate tenants, retail brands and tourism-related business segments.

Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. is a leading natural gas compression services provider operating primarily across North America. It serves upstream and midstream energy sector clients, offering custom compression equipment, regular maintenance, and operational support to optimize natural gas gathering, processing, and transportation workflows for onshore oil and gas production operations.

ESBA vs KGS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KGS
KGS
1.7× larger
KGS
$332.9M
$199.2M
ESBA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KGS
KGS
+6.7% gap
KGS
7.5%
0.8%
ESBA
Higher net margin
ESBA
ESBA
8.8% more per $
ESBA
16.1%
7.4%
KGS
More free cash flow
KGS
KGS
$91.5M more FCF
KGS
$142.0M
$50.6M
ESBA
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KGS
KGS
Annualised
KGS
24.3%
4.9%
ESBA

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Revenue
$199.2M
$332.9M
Net Profit
$32.2M
$24.6M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
17.8%
26.1%
Net Margin
16.1%
7.4%
Revenue YoY
0.8%
7.5%
Net Profit YoY
71.2%
29.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11
$0.30

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
$199.2M
$332.9M
Q3 25
$197.7M
$322.7M
Q2 25
$191.3M
$322.8M
Q1 25
$180.1M
$329.6M
Q4 24
$197.6M
$309.5M
Q3 24
$199.6M
$324.6M
Q2 24
$189.5M
$309.7M
Q1 24
$181.2M
$215.5M
Net Profit
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
$32.2M
$24.6M
Q3 25
$13.6M
$-14.0M
Q2 25
$11.4M
$39.5M
Q1 25
$15.8M
$30.4M
Q4 24
$18.8M
$19.1M
Q3 24
$22.8M
$-5.6M
Q2 24
$28.6M
$6.2M
Q1 24
$10.2M
$30.2M
Gross Margin
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
37.5%
Q2 24
36.5%
Q1 24
39.4%
Operating Margin
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
17.8%
26.1%
Q3 25
19.9%
19.9%
Q2 25
18.4%
30.9%
Q1 25
14.3%
27.1%
Q4 24
21.7%
22.3%
Q3 24
22.7%
20.4%
Q2 24
20.8%
17.5%
Q1 24
17.1%
27.9%
Net Margin
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
16.1%
7.4%
Q3 25
6.9%
-4.3%
Q2 25
6.0%
12.2%
Q1 25
8.8%
9.2%
Q4 24
9.5%
6.2%
Q3 24
11.4%
-1.7%
Q2 24
15.1%
2.0%
Q1 24
5.6%
14.0%
EPS (diluted)
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
$0.11
$0.30
Q3 25
$0.05
$-0.17
Q2 25
$0.04
$0.43
Q1 25
$0.05
$0.33
Q4 24
$0.07
$0.18
Q3 24
$0.08
$-0.07
Q2 24
$0.10
$0.06
Q1 24
$0.03
$0.39

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$132.7M
$3.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.2B
Total Assets
$4.5B
$4.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.12×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
$132.7M
$3.2M
Q3 25
$154.1M
$724.0K
Q2 25
$94.6M
$5.4M
Q1 25
$187.8M
$1.9M
Q4 24
$385.5M
$4.8M
Q3 24
$421.9M
$7.4M
Q2 24
$535.5M
$3.9M
Q1 24
$333.6M
$9.3M
Total Debt
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
$2.6B
Q3 25
$2.6B
Q2 25
$2.5B
Q1 25
$2.6B
Q4 24
$2.6B
Q3 24
$2.6B
Q2 24
$2.5B
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.5B
Q1 24
$1.1B
Total Assets
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
$4.5B
$4.3B
Q3 25
$4.1B
$4.4B
Q2 25
$4.1B
$4.4B
Q1 25
$4.1B
$4.4B
Q4 24
$4.5B
$4.4B
Q3 24
$4.4B
$4.5B
Q2 24
$4.4B
$4.4B
Q1 24
$4.2B
$3.3B
Debt / Equity
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
2.12×
Q3 25
2.08×
Q2 25
1.89×
Q1 25
1.91×
Q4 24
1.88×
Q3 24
1.86×
Q2 24
1.71×
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$249.1M
$194.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$50.6M
$142.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
25.4%
42.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
99.6%
15.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
7.74×
7.91×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$109.3M
$284.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
$249.1M
$194.9M
Q3 25
$105.3M
$113.4M
Q2 25
$26.7M
$177.2M
Q1 25
$83.1M
$114.3M
Q4 24
$260.9M
$118.5M
Q3 24
$102.8M
$36.9M
Q2 24
$37.1M
$121.1M
Q1 24
$70.9M
$51.5M
Free Cash Flow
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
$50.6M
$142.0M
Q3 25
$72.8M
$10.9M
Q2 25
$-55.1M
$94.6M
Q1 25
$41.1M
$36.8M
Q4 24
$88.0M
$45.2M
Q3 24
$-65.1M
$-49.7M
Q2 24
$19.5M
$4.0M
Q1 24
$23.2M
$-8.6M
FCF Margin
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
25.4%
42.7%
Q3 25
36.8%
3.4%
Q2 25
-28.8%
29.3%
Q1 25
22.8%
11.2%
Q4 24
44.5%
14.6%
Q3 24
-32.6%
-15.3%
Q2 24
10.3%
1.3%
Q1 24
12.8%
-4.0%
Capex Intensity
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
99.6%
15.9%
Q3 25
16.5%
31.7%
Q2 25
42.8%
25.6%
Q1 25
23.4%
23.5%
Q4 24
87.5%
23.7%
Q3 24
84.1%
26.7%
Q2 24
9.3%
37.8%
Q1 24
26.3%
27.9%
Cash Conversion
ESBA
ESBA
KGS
KGS
Q4 25
7.74×
7.91×
Q3 25
7.72×
Q2 25
2.35×
4.49×
Q1 25
5.27×
3.76×
Q4 24
13.88×
6.21×
Q3 24
4.51×
Q2 24
1.30×
19.44×
Q1 24
6.94×
1.70×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ESBA
ESBA

Real Estate Segment$163.8M82%
Observatory Segment$35.2M18%

KGS
KGS

Other Services$126.8M38%
Other$112.2M34%
Transferred At Point In Time$93.8M28%

Related Comparisons