vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC (ESE) and FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC (FIBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($313.0M vs $289.7M, roughly 1.1× ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC). FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC runs the higher net margin — 34.8% vs 9.9%, a 24.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.8% vs 17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC's revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 7.8%).
Esco is a Singaporean brand that develops, manufactures, and sells products and services for laboratories.
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. is a financial holding company headquartered in Billings, Montana. It is the parent company of First Interstate Bank, a community bank with locations throughout 14 states within the Western and Midwestern United States. It is the largest bank based in Montana, as measured by total assets.
ESE vs FIBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $289.7M | $313.0M |
| Net Profit | $28.7M | $108.8M |
| Gross Margin | 41.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 44.5% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 34.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | 19.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.2% | 108.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $1.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $289.7M | $313.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.5M | $250.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.3M | $248.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.5M | $247.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.0M | $261.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.5M | $251.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.8M | $244.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $249.1M | $242.2M |
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $108.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.7M | $71.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | $71.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.0M | $50.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5M | $52.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.3M | $55.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.2M | $58.4M |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | 31.7% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.3% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.43 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $0.69 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.20 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.91 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.90 | $0.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $145.5M | $146.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $3.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $26.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $145.5M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | $146.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.0M | $252.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $132.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.0M | $137.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | $383.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | $370.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $26.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $27.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $27.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $28.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $29.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $29.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $30.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $30.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.09× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.09× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.10× | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.16× | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.9M | $305.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.40× | 2.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $239.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | $305.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.9M | $91.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.7M | $68.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $78.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | $355.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $89.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.2M | $82.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $87.6M |
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.40× | 2.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | 1.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.83× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.46× | 6.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.10× | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | 1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESE
| US Government | $98.0M | 34% |
| Utility Solutions Group | $87.5M | 30% |
| RF Shielding And Test | $58.3M | 20% |
| Commercial | $45.8M | 16% |
| Related Party | $1.3M | 0% |
FIBK
Segment breakdown not available.