vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC (ESE) and Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($289.7M vs $235.9M, roughly 1.2× Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.). ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 3.4%, a 6.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs 17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (7.8% CAGR vs -13.8%).
Esco is a Singaporean brand that develops, manufactures, and sells products and services for laboratories.
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
ESE vs HHH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $289.7M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $28.7M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 41.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 121.6% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | 18.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.2% | -25.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $235.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.7M | $624.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.5M | $390.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.3M | $260.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.5M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.0M | $935.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.5M | $327.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.8M | $317.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.7M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.0M | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5M | $156.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.3M | $72.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | $21.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 121.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | 20.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.3% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.43 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.20 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.91 | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | $1.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $145.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $11.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.4M | $493.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.3M | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.0M | $400.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.0M | $436.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $145.5M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $10.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $9.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.09× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.09× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $239.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | $360.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.9M | $149.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.7M | $177.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | $-224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | $337.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $248.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.2M | $-17.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | $348.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.8M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $169.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $-238.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | $317.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | $238.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $-25.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.7% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | 35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | -119.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | 73.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | -7.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.40× | 60.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | -21.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.46× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.10× | 3.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | -0.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESE
| US Government | $98.0M | 34% |
| Utility Solutions Group | $87.5M | 30% |
| RF Shielding And Test | $58.3M | 20% |
| Commercial | $45.8M | 16% |
| Related Party | $1.3M | 0% |
HHH
| Rental revenue | $113.5M | 48% |
| Master Planned Communities land sales | $99.6M | 42% |
| Other revenues | $11.0M | 5% |
| Builder price participation | $8.7M | 4% |
| Condominium rights and unit sales | $3.1M | 1% |