vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC (ESE) and Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($289.7M vs $251.2M, roughly 1.2× Orla Mining Ltd.).
Esco is a Singaporean brand that develops, manufactures, and sells products and services for laboratories.
Orla Mining Ltd. is a Canada-based mineral exploration and development firm focused on high-grade gold and precious metal assets in North and Central America, with core projects in Mexico and Nevada, U.S. It follows sustainable responsible mining practices, collaborates with local communities, and delivers long-term value to stakeholders.
ESE vs ORLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $289.7M | $251.2M |
| Net Profit | $28.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | 41.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 17.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 22.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $289.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.5M | $251.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.3M | $151.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.5M | $584.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.8M | $110.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $249.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.3M | $-368.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.5% | -63.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.43 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.91 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.32 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.90 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $145.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $507.4M |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $598.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.0M | $96.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $145.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $191.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $507.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $507.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $968.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $400.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $598.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $598.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $535.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.16× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.9M | $126.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $63.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $239.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.9M | $126.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.7M | $74.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $92.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.2M | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $97.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESE
| US Government | $98.0M | 34% |
| Utility Solutions Group | $87.5M | 30% |
| RF Shielding And Test | $58.3M | 20% |
| Commercial | $45.8M | 16% |
| Related Party | $1.3M | 0% |
ORLA
Segment breakdown not available.
