vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Energy Services of America CORP (ESOA) and GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($152.7M vs $114.1M, roughly 1.3× Energy Services of America CORP).
Superior Energy Services is an American oil services company that operates as a holding company for a portfolio of oilfield equipment rentals and well oil and gas services brands.
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
ESOA vs GILT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.1M | $152.7M |
| Net Profit | — | $6.3M |
| Gross Margin | 12.3% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 5.4% |
| Net Margin | — | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $57016808.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $114.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.6M | $152.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.9M | $126.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | 39.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $57016808.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.41 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.06 | $56622204.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.7M | $64.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $62.0M | $56.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $60.6M | $315.8M |
| Total Assets | $201.0M | $575.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.02× | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $64.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5M | $93.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $62.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.1M | $56.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $60.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.4M | $315.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.0M | $282.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $201.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $215.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.1M | $575.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $170.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.8M | $416.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $136.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.09× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.61× | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-847.5K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-582.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.3M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESOA
| Electricals Mechanical And General | $49.4M | 43% |
| Gas And Petroleum Transmission | $24.1M | 21% |
| Cost Plus And TM Contracts | $23.3M | 20% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $17.9M | 16% |
GILT
Segment breakdown not available.
