vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Energy Services of America CORP (ESOA) and PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Energy Services of America CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($114.1M vs $75.5M, roughly 1.5× PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs 13.4%). Energy Services of America CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.8M vs $14.4M). Over the past eight quarters, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs 26.7%).
Superior Energy Services is an American oil services company that operates as a holding company for a portfolio of oilfield equipment rentals and well oil and gas services brands.
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
ESOA vs PBYI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.1M | $75.5M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 12.3% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 22.7% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | 27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $114.1M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.1M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.6M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.7M | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.7M | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.9M | $47.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.1M | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | 12.3% | 69.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | 77.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | 75.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.5% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.41 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.06 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.7M | $97.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $62.0M | $22.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $60.6M | $130.3M |
| Total Assets | $201.0M | $216.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.02× | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.7M | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $94.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9M | $93.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | $107.2M |
| Q4 25 | $62.0M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.2M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.1M | $45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.7M | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.6M | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.9M | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.7M | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | $60.6M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.2M | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.4M | $104.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.7M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.0M | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $71.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.0M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.6M | $51.0M |
| Q4 25 | $201.0M | $216.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $215.2M | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.1M | $194.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $170.2M | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.1M | $213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.2M | $220.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.8M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $136.1M | $214.1M |
| Q4 25 | 1.02× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.09× | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.94× | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.61× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | 2.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.8M | $14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.8M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.7% | 19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.1M | $41.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.3M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-847.5K | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $16.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.0M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-582.0K | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.3M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.3% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.6% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESOA
| Electricals Mechanical And General | $49.4M | 43% |
| Gas And Petroleum Transmission | $24.1M | 21% |
| Cost Plus And TM Contracts | $23.3M | 20% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $17.9M | 16% |
PBYI
Segment breakdown not available.
