vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Energy Services of America CORP (ESOA) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.8M vs $114.1M, roughly 1.9× Energy Services of America CORP). On growth, Energy Services of America CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.4% vs 9.6%). Energy Services of America CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.8M vs $-19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Energy Services of America CORP's revenue compounded faster (26.7% CAGR vs 9.5%).
Superior Energy Services is an American oil services company that operates as a holding company for a portfolio of oilfield equipment rentals and well oil and gas services brands.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
ESOA vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $114.1M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 12.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | — | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $114.1M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $130.1M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.6M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.7M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.6M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.7M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.9M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.1M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.5% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.41 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.06 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.7M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $62.0M | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $60.6M | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $201.0M | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.02× | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $16.7M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | $116.1M |
| Q4 25 | $62.0M | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.2M | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.1M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.7M | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.6M | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.9M | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.7M | $141.9M |
| Q4 25 | $60.6M | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.2M | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.4M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.7M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.0M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.0M | $239.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.6M | $232.6M |
| Q4 25 | $201.0M | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $215.2M | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.1M | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $170.2M | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.1M | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.2M | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.8M | $706.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $136.1M | $702.1M |
| Q4 25 | 1.02× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.09× | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.94× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.98× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.61× | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.8M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.8M | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.7% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.1M | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.8M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.3M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-847.5K | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.3M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $16.8M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-582.0K | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.1M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.9M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 14.7% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.3% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.8% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.9% | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESOA
| Electricals Mechanical And General | $49.4M | 43% |
| Gas And Petroleum Transmission | $24.1M | 21% |
| Cost Plus And TM Contracts | $23.3M | 20% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $17.9M | 16% |
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
