vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (ESRT) and KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST (KRG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($204.2M vs $199.2M, roughly 1.0× Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.). KITE REALTY GROUP TRUST runs the higher net margin — 88.6% vs 16.1%, a 72.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.8% vs -4.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs -0.8%).
Empire State Realty Trust is a leading real estate investment trust that owns, manages, and operates a portfolio of premium commercial, residential, and retail properties primarily in the New York City metropolitan area, including the iconic Empire State Building. It serves corporate tenants, retail partners, and residential occupants, focusing on sustainable property operations and long-term asset value growth.
Kite Realty Group Trust is a publicly traded U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust. It primarily owns, operates, and develops high-quality open-air shopping centers and mixed-use properties, with a portfolio spanning key regional markets across the United States. Its tenant base includes national retail chains, local independent merchants, and dining and entertainment operators, serving local community consumer needs.
ESRT vs KRG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.2M | $204.2M |
| Net Profit | $32.2M | $180.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 16.1% | 88.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | -4.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 71.2% | 728.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $199.2M | $204.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.7M | $205.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.3M | $213.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $180.1M | $221.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.6M | $214.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.6M | $207.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.5M | $212.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $181.2M | $207.4M |
| Q4 25 | $32.2M | $180.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $110.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.8M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.8M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.6M | $-48.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.2M | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.3% | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | -10.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.1% | 19.0% |
| Q4 25 | 16.1% | 88.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 51.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | -22.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.6% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $132.7M | $36.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $4.5B | $6.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $132.7M | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.1M | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.6M | $182.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $187.8M | $49.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.5M | $478.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.9M | $467.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $535.5M | $273.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.6M | $348.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $996.1M | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | $4.5B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $6.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $249.1M | $106.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 25.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 99.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.74× | 0.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $109.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $249.1M | $106.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.3M | $116.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.1M | $74.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.8M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.1M | $142.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.9M | $53.6M |
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-55.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-65.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 99.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 87.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 84.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.74× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.35× | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.27× | 3.12× | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.88× | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.51× | 6.72× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.94× | 3.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ESRT
| Real Estate Segment | $163.8M | 82% |
| Observatory Segment | $35.2M | 18% |
KRG
| Minimum Rent | $156.3M | 77% |
| Tenant Reimbursements | $42.0M | 21% |
| Real Estate Other | $4.3M | 2% |
| Overage Rent | $2.0M | 1% |
