vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of enCore Energy Corp. (EU) and Osisko Development Corp. (ODV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
enCore Energy Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.4M vs $10.4M, roughly 1.2× Osisko Development Corp.).
Devon Energy Corporation is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware with operational headquarters in the 50-story Devon Energy Center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Its operations are in the Delaware Basin, Eagle Ford Group, and the Rocky Mountains.
Osisko Development Corp. is a Canada-based mining exploration and development firm focused on high-grade gold and precious metal assets. It holds North American mineral projects, advancing them through exploration, feasibility study, and pre-production phases while adhering to sustainable mining standards.
EU vs ODV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.4M | $10.4M |
| Net Profit | $-21.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | 37.9% | 3.2% |
| Operating Margin | -135.9% | -149.3% |
| Net Margin | -173.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $4.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-21.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-23.8M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $-76.8M |
| Q4 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -135.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -158.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -526.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -85.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -149.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -124.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -241.5% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -1940.8% |
| Q4 25 | -173.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -172.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -132.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -108.2% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -1641.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $52.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $110.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $229.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $430.4M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $110.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $229.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $267.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $430.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $362.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 57.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 46.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-45.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -296.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -385.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -64.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 68.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 115.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
