vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EVgo Inc. (EVGO) and YSX Tech Co., Ltd (YSXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EVgo Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($118.5M vs $41.0M, roughly 2.9× YSX Tech Co., Ltd). YSX Tech Co., Ltd runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs -4.1%, a 10.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EVgo Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (75.5% vs 20.2%).
EVgo Inc. is an electric vehicle fast charging network in the United States, with more than 950 charging locations as of August 2023. The company's charge stations are located in 35 states and are compatible with all major auto manufacturers.
EVGO vs YSXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $118.5M | $41.0M |
| Net Profit | $-4.8M | $2.7M |
| Gross Margin | 38.0% | 9.7% |
| Operating Margin | -10.4% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | -4.1% | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 75.5% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.1% | 39.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $118.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.3M | $41.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.5M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 38.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -36.9% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -31.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -47.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -48.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -58.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -18.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $151.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $206.5M | $2.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-116.9M | $30.8M |
| Total Assets | $964.8M | $47.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.07× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $151.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $154.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.9M | $437.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $175.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $206.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $157.3M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-116.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-428.1M | $30.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-230.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-36.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-256.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-344.8M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $964.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $931.8M | $47.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $864.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $856.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $803.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $791.7M | $31.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $785.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $787.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.3M | $-7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-38.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -32.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 41.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.88× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-124.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.8M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $-688.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-38.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-49.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-25.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.7M | $-690.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-35.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -32.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.3% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -63.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVGO
| Charging Network Revenue | $63.6M | 54% |
| Charging Revenue Retail | $35.8M | 30% |
| Charging Revenue Commercial | $9.3M | 8% |
| Charging Revenue Oem | $6.5M | 6% |
| Regulatory Credit Sales | $2.2M | 2% |
YSXT
Segment breakdown not available.
