vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($38.5M vs $11.5M, roughly 3.4× TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.3% vs 11.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (31.8% CAGR vs 3.5%).
Sentient Technologies was an American artificial intelligence technology company based in San Francisco. Sentient was founded in 2007 and received over $143 million in funding at different points after its inception. As of 2016, Sentient was the world's most well-funded AI company. It focused on e-commerce, online content and trading.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
EVLV vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $38.5M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $10.9M | — |
| Gross Margin | 48.4% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | -20.7% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | 28.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 32.3% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 169.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $38.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.5M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.0M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.1M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.4M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-40.5M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.4M | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.3M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 48.4% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.7% | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.8% | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 57.5% | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.8% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.5% | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.8% | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | -20.7% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -53.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -45.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -64.9% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -70.0% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.7% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -98.8% | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -124.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -111.3% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.6% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.1M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $28.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.4M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $304.4M | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.1M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.2M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.9M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.0M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.9M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.0M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.5M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.0M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.4M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.2M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.7M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.1M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.7M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.0M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $151.2M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.8M | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | $304.4M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $304.3M | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $280.4M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.0M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.1M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.5M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $269.1M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $280.0M | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.6M | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.43× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.6M | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.2M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
