vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evercore Inc. (EVR) and ON Semiconductor (ON). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ON Semiconductor is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.1× Evercore Inc.). Evercore Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.0% vs 16.4%, a 6.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evercore Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.3% vs -10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Evercore Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.2% CAGR vs -12.3%).
Evercore Inc., formerly known as Evercore Partners, is a global independent investment banking advisory firm founded in 1995 by Roger Altman, David Offensend, and Austin Beutner. The firm has advised on over $4.7 trillion of merger, acquisition, and restructuring transactions since its founding.
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
EVR vs ON — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $322.7M | $255.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 23.0% | 16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 100.3% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.1% | -32.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.20 | $0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $838.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $699.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $979.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.4M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $322.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.0M | $255.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.6M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.2M | $-486.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $379.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $401.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $338.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -39.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 22.4% |
| Q1 26 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | -33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | $7.20 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.80 | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.41 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $-1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.48 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.32 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.86 | $0.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.81 | $0.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $7.9B |
| Total Assets | — | $13.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $8.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $13.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $14.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $13.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.41× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $418.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $372.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $807.5M | $418.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $560.9M | $184.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.7M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-549.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $686.4M | $579.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $465.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.5M | $362.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $798.6M | $372.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $541.5M | $106.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $411.7M | $454.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-569.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $673.1M | $434.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $226.6M | $293.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.7M | $207.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.1% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.7% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | 12.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.88× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.76× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.89× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.99× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.72× | 1.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVR
| Advisory Fees (1) | $1.2B | 89% |
| Commissions and Related Revenue | $62.7M | 4% |
| Underwriting Fees | $55.1M | 4% |
| Asset Management and Administration Fees (2) | $23.7M | 2% |
| Other Revenue, net | $15.4M | 1% |
ON
| Industrial Segment | $426.3M | 27% |
| Other End Markets Segment | $337.3M | 22% |
| Intelligent Sensing Segments | $284.0M | 18% |
| Direct Customers | $282.4M | 18% |
| Intelligent Sensing Group | $230.0M | 15% |
