vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evercore Inc. (EVR) and PACS Group, Inc. (PACS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evercore Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.0× PACS Group, Inc.). Evercore Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.0% vs 4.4%, a 18.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evercore Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (100.3% vs 18.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Evercore Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.2% CAGR vs 20.5%).
Evercore Inc., formerly known as Evercore Partners, is a global independent investment banking advisory firm founded in 1995 by Roger Altman, David Offensend, and Austin Beutner. The firm has advised on over $4.7 trillion of merger, acquisition, and restructuring transactions since its founding.
EVR vs PACS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $322.7M | $59.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.0% |
| Net Margin | 23.0% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 100.3% | 18.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 106.1% | 3022.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $7.20 | $0.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $838.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $699.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $979.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.4M | $981.4M |
| Q1 26 | $322.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $204.0M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.6M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.2M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $146.2M | $28.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.4M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.4M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $-10.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.6% | -1.1% |
| Q1 26 | $7.20 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.80 | $0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.41 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.48 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.32 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.86 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.81 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $197.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $353.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $946.8M |
| Total Assets | — | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $355.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $294.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $287.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $157.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $73.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $353.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $411.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $946.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $871.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $806.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $750.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $709.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $660.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $572.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-3.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.06× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $807.5M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $560.9M | $204.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.7M | $52.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-549.7M | $150.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $686.4M | $64.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $209.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.5M | $34.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $798.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $541.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $411.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-569.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $673.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $226.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $340.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 49.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | -0.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.88× | 3.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.50× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.76× | 5.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.89× | 33.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.99× | 13.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.72× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVR
| Advisory Fees (1) | $1.2B | 89% |
| Commissions and Related Revenue | $62.7M | 4% |
| Underwriting Fees | $55.1M | 4% |
| Asset Management and Administration Fees (2) | $23.7M | 2% |
| Other Revenue, net | $15.4M | 1% |
PACS
Segment breakdown not available.
