vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Evergy (EVRG) and Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Fifth Third Bancorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.2× Evergy). Fifth Third Bancorp runs the higher net margin — 47.7% vs 6.5%, a 41.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fifth Third Bancorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.4% vs 5.3%). Fifth Third Bancorp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($765.0M vs $-530.5M).

Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.

Fifth Third Bancorp is a bank holding company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. It is the parent company of Fifth Third Bank, which operates 1,087 branches and 2,400 automated teller machines, across 12 states: Ohio, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and West Virginia. It is on the list of largest banks in the United States and is ranked 321st on the Fortune 500. The name "Fifth Third" is derived from the names of the...

EVRG vs FITB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
FITB
FITB
1.2× larger
FITB
$1.5B
$1.3B
EVRG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FITB
FITB
+1.1% gap
FITB
6.4%
5.3%
EVRG
Higher net margin
FITB
FITB
41.2% more per $
FITB
47.7%
6.5%
EVRG
More free cash flow
FITB
FITB
$1.3B more FCF
FITB
$765.0M
$-530.5M
EVRG

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Revenue
$1.3B
$1.5B
Net Profit
$84.3M
$730.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
18.5%
59.7%
Net Margin
6.5%
47.7%
Revenue YoY
5.3%
6.4%
Net Profit YoY
7.8%
17.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.35
$1.03

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$1.3B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.8B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$1.4B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.8B
Q2 24
$1.4B
Q1 24
$1.3B
Net Profit
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$84.3M
$730.0M
Q3 25
$475.0M
$649.0M
Q2 25
$171.3M
$628.0M
Q1 25
$125.0M
$515.0M
Q4 24
$78.2M
$620.0M
Q3 24
$465.6M
Q2 24
$207.0M
Q1 24
$122.7M
Operating Margin
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
18.5%
59.7%
Q3 25
37.3%
55.1%
Q2 25
25.4%
54.0%
Q1 25
22.5%
45.4%
Q4 24
18.1%
53.3%
Q3 24
35.1%
Q2 24
25.4%
Q1 24
20.3%
Net Margin
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
6.5%
47.7%
Q3 25
26.9%
42.7%
Q2 25
12.6%
42.0%
Q1 25
9.7%
35.8%
Q4 24
6.4%
43.1%
Q3 24
26.0%
Q2 24
14.7%
Q1 24
9.6%
EPS (diluted)
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$0.35
$1.03
Q3 25
$2.03
$0.91
Q2 25
$0.74
$0.88
Q1 25
$0.54
$0.71
Q4 24
$0.34
$0.85
Q3 24
$2.02
Q2 24
$0.90
Q1 24
$0.53

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$19.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$13.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.2B
$21.7B
Total Assets
$33.9B
$214.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.63×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$19.8M
Q3 25
$27.5M
Q2 25
$27.8M
Q1 25
$35.3M
Q4 24
$22.0M
Q3 24
$34.6M
Q2 24
$26.1M
Q1 24
$63.7M
Total Debt
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$13.6B
Q3 25
$13.7B
Q2 25
$14.5B
Q1 25
$14.5B
Q4 24
$14.3B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$10.2B
$21.7B
Q3 25
$10.3B
$21.1B
Q2 25
$10.0B
$21.1B
Q1 25
$9.9B
$20.4B
Q4 24
$10.0B
$19.6B
Q3 24
$10.0B
Q2 24
$9.7B
Q1 24
$9.6B
Total Assets
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$33.9B
$214.4B
Q3 25
$33.4B
$212.9B
Q2 25
$32.9B
$210.0B
Q1 25
$32.5B
$212.7B
Q4 24
$32.3B
$212.9B
Q3 24
$32.1B
Q2 24
$31.8B
Q1 24
$31.3B
Debt / Equity
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
0.63×
Q3 25
0.65×
Q2 25
0.69×
Q1 25
0.71×
Q4 24
0.73×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$334.0M
$929.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-530.5M
$765.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-41.1%
50.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
66.9%
10.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.96×
1.27×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-751.7M
$3.9B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$334.0M
$929.0M
Q3 25
$937.7M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$323.9M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$449.6M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$395.6M
$-101.0M
Q3 24
$953.3M
Q2 24
$317.5M
Q1 24
$317.3M
Free Cash Flow
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
$-530.5M
$765.0M
Q3 25
$225.4M
$886.0M
Q2 25
$-303.4M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$-143.2M
$1.1B
Q4 24
$-118.6M
$-246.0M
Q3 24
$427.0M
Q2 24
$-360.0M
Q1 24
$-301.3M
FCF Margin
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
-41.1%
50.0%
Q3 25
12.8%
58.3%
Q2 25
-22.4%
77.8%
Q1 25
-11.1%
77.7%
Q4 24
-9.7%
-17.1%
Q3 24
23.9%
Q2 24
-25.6%
Q1 24
-23.5%
Capex Intensity
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
66.9%
10.7%
Q3 25
40.4%
10.5%
Q2 25
46.3%
9.6%
Q1 25
45.8%
8.1%
Q4 24
41.9%
10.1%
Q3 24
29.4%
Q2 24
48.1%
Q1 24
48.3%
Cash Conversion
EVRG
EVRG
FITB
FITB
Q4 25
3.96×
1.27×
Q3 25
1.97×
1.61×
Q2 25
1.89×
2.08×
Q1 25
3.60×
2.39×
Q4 24
5.06×
-0.16×
Q3 24
2.05×
Q2 24
1.53×
Q1 24
2.59×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

EVRG
EVRG

Electric Utility Customer Class Residential$462.9M36%
Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial$447.6M35%
Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial$164.1M13%
Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission$129.4M10%
Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale$69.7M5%
Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail$12.2M1%
Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam$5.7M0%

FITB
FITB

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons