vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evergy (EVRG) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evergy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $692.4M, roughly 1.9× OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC). Evergy runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs 5.2%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Evergy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.3% vs 3.6%). OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-76.5M vs $-530.5M). Over the past eight quarters, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.
EVRG vs OII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $692.4M |
| Net Profit | $84.3M | $36.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | -28.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $692.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $668.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $742.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $698.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $713.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $679.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $668.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $84.3M | $177.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.0M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.3M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.0M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.2M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.6M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.0M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.1% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.03 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.90 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $488.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.2B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $33.9B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $695.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $504.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $488.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $487.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3B | $907.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | $842.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $773.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $698.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $651.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $334.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-530.5M | $-76.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -41.1% | -11.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 66.9% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.96× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-751.7M | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $334.0M | $221.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.7M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.6M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.6M | $128.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $953.3M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.5M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-76.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-530.5M | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.4M | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-303.4M | $46.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-143.2M | $-106.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.6M | $94.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.0M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-360.0M | $29.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -41.1% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.6% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 66.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | -1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.06× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
OII
Segment breakdown not available.