vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Evergy (EVRG) and UPBOUND GROUP, INC. (UPBD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Evergy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× UPBOUND GROUP, INC.). Evergy runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs 1.7%, a 4.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UPBOUND GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.9% vs 5.3%). UPBOUND GROUP, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.0M vs $-530.5M). Over the past eight quarters, UPBOUND GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (4.5% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
Upbound Group, Inc. is a leading US provider of flexible lease-to-own solutions for consumer goods. It offers furniture, consumer electronics, home appliances, and accessories, catering to customers seeking accessible payment alternatives to traditional retail financing.
EVRG vs UPBD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $84.3M | $19.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.5% | 4.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.5% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.3% | 10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.8% | -36.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $84.3M | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.3M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $125.0M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.2M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.6M | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $207.0M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.7M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 47.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.3% |
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | 5.6% |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.6% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.03 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.74 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.90 | $0.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.53 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $120.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.2B | $695.7M |
| Total Assets | $33.9B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $120.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.5M | $107.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.3M | $107.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.6M | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.1M | $82.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.7M | $84.8M |
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $695.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3B | $687.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0B | $685.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $679.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $629.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $611.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7B | $596.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | $578.3M |
| Q4 25 | $33.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.3B | $2.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $334.0M | $41.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-530.5M | $24.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -41.1% | 2.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 66.9% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.96× | 2.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-751.7M | $238.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $334.0M | $41.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.7M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.9M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.6M | $137.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $395.6M | $-61.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $953.3M | $106.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $317.5M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $317.3M | $45.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-530.5M | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.4M | $97.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-303.4M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-143.2M | $127.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.6M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.0M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-360.0M | $613.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-301.3M | $33.6M |
| Q4 25 | -41.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.4% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.1% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.5% | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | 66.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.3% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.96× | 2.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | 8.96× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.60× | 5.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.06× | -2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 3.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.53× | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.59× | 1.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
UPBD
Segment breakdown not available.
