vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Edwards Lifesciences (EW) and North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Edwards Lifesciences is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $860.2M, roughly 1.9× North American Construction Group Ltd.). Edwards Lifesciences runs the higher net margin — 23.1% vs 4.7%, a 18.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, North American Construction Group Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (58.0% CAGR vs 9.7%).
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring. It developed the Sapien transcatheter aortic heart valve made of cow tissue within a balloon-expandable, cobalt-chromium frame, deployed via catheter.
Shanghai Construction (Group) Corporation (SCG) is a Chinese construction and engineering company, ranked as the 16th largest construction company in the world based on 2011 revenues.
EW vs NOA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $860.2M |
| Net Profit | $380.7M | $40.5M |
| Gross Margin | 78.0% | 19.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | 15.4% |
| Net Margin | 23.1% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.66 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $860.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $573.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $297.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $636.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $439.5M |
| Q1 26 | $380.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $91.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $291.1M | $40.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $358.0M | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $366.3M | $34.1M |
| Q1 26 | 78.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.8% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.5% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 78.7% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.6% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 79.9% | 14.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.8% | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 226.7% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.7% | 7.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.61 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.61 | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $140.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $450.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $573.7M | $140.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $290.2M | $85.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $280.4M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-127.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $351.8M | $109.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $371.5M | $72.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $353.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $516.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $240.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $224.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-177.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $286.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.97× | 3.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.87× | 3.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.78× | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.11× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.01× | 2.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.