vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EXELIXIS, INC. (EXEL) and eXp World Holdings, Inc. (EXPI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
eXp World Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $598.7M, roughly 2.0× EXELIXIS, INC.). EXELIXIS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 40.8% vs -1.1%, a 41.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, eXp World Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.5% vs 5.6%). EXELIXIS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($332.4M vs $11.9M). Over the past eight quarters, EXELIXIS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (18.7% CAGR vs 12.4%).
Exelixis, Inc. is a genomics-based drug discovery company located in Alameda, California, and the producer of Cometriq, a treatment approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for medullary thyroid cancer with clinical activity in several other types of metastatic cancer.
eXp World Holdings, Inc. is a global cloud-based real estate services provider. It operates the eXp Realty brokerage network, leverages immersive virtual 3D campus environments to support agent collaboration and operations, serves residential and commercial real estate markets across over 20 countries, and offers complementary services including mortgage, title insurance and professional development resources for real estate practitioners.
EXEL vs EXPI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $598.7M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $244.5M | $-12.9M |
| Gross Margin | 95.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 39.3% | -1.1% |
| Net Margin | 40.8% | -1.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.6% | 8.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 74.8% | -35.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.89 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $598.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $597.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $568.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $566.8M | $954.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $637.2M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $244.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $193.6M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $184.8M | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.6M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.9M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $118.0M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $226.1M | $12.4M |
| Q1 26 | 95.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 96.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 96.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 96.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 96.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 96.8% | 99.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 97.2% | 99.9% |
| Q1 26 | 39.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.6% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.3% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | 40.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.4% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.5% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.89 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.69 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.65 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.55 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.40 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $124.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $242.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $442.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $988.5M | $124.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $791.1M | $112.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $94.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $115.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $113.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $130.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $108.4M |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $242.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $235.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $218.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $212.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $204.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $220.3M |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $442.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $458.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $481.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $435.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $390.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $432.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $457.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $333.5M | $13.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $332.4M | $11.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 55.5% | 1.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.36× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $875.8M | $109.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $333.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $290.3M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.0M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $211.4M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $240.3M | $39.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $271.3M | $46.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.5M | $71.1M |
| Q1 26 | $332.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $288.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.2M | $26.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.5M | $33.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $236.3M | $37.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.1M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.0M | $69.7M |
| Q1 26 | 55.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 48.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.7% | 5.4% |
| Q1 26 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.27× | 8.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.53× | 5.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXEL
| Cabometyx | $544.7M | 91% |
| Collaboration | $52.1M | 9% |
| Collaborative Arrangementwith Takeda | $5.9M | 1% |
| Cometriq | $1.8M | 0% |
EXPI
| North American Realty | $1.1B | 96% |
| International Realty | $42.2M | 4% |
