vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Expeditors International (EXPD) and Fidelity National Information Services (FIS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Expeditors International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.8B, roughly 1.0× Fidelity National Information Services). Fidelity National Information Services runs the higher net margin — 18.2% vs 7.0%, a 11.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fidelity National Information Services posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs -3.3%). Fidelity National Information Services produced more free cash flow last quarter ($739.0M vs $270.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Expeditors International's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 6.8%).
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 service-based logistics company with headquarters in Bellevue, Washington. Expeditors generates highly optimized and customized supply chain solutions for clients with unified technology systems integrated through a global network of over 340+ locations in 100+ countries on six continents.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is an American multinational corporation which offers a wide range of financial products and services. FIS is most known for its development of Financial Technology, or FinTech. Annually, FIS facilitates the movement of roughly US$9 trillion through the processing of approximately 75 billion transactions in service to more than 20,000 clients around the globe.
EXPD vs FIS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $200.7M | $511.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 18.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 18.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.3% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.9% | 97.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.50 | $0.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $200.7M | $511.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.3M | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.6M | $-470.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.8M | $77.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.9M | $259.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $224.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.5M | $243.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $169.2M | $724.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | -18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | 29.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.50 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.64 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.47 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.68 | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.63 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.24 | $0.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.17 | $1.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $599.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $13.9B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $599.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $571.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $581.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $805.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $13.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $14.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $15.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $15.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $17.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $18.0B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $33.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $33.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $33.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $32.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $33.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $34.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $34.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $35.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.59× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $283.3M | $758.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $270.3M | $739.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | 26.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.41× | 1.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $953.4M | $2.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $283.3M | $758.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.2M | $382.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $342.6M | $457.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.7M | $782.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.0M | $641.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.9M | $206.0M |
| Q4 25 | $270.3M | $739.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.3M | $952.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.3M | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.5M | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.7M | $764.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.7M | $605.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.8M | $530.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.7M | $179.0M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.2% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.41× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 3.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | 5.94× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | 3.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 2.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.72× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.52× | 0.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXPD
| Customs Brokerage And Other Services | $1.1B | 40% |
| Airfreight Services | $1.1B | 39% |
| Ocean Freight And Ocean Services | $611.4M | 21% |
FIS
| Banking Solutions | $1.6B | 57% |
| Other | $701.0M | 25% |
| Capital Market Solutions | $508.0M | 18% |
