vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Expeditors International (EXPD) and Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fresenius Medical Care AG is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.5B vs $2.9B, roughly 1.9× Expeditors International). Fresenius Medical Care AG runs the higher net margin — 7.9% vs 7.0%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fresenius Medical Care AG posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.3% vs -3.3%).
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 service-based logistics company with headquarters in Bellevue, Washington. Expeditors generates highly optimized and customized supply chain solutions for clients with unified technology systems integrated through a global network of over 340+ locations in 100+ countries on six continents.
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA is a German healthcare company which provides kidney dialysis services through a network of 4,171 outpatient dialysis centers, serving 345,425 patients. The company primarily treats end-stage renal disease (ESRD), which requires patients to undergo dialysis 3 times per week for the rest of their lives.
EXPD vs FMS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $5.5B |
| Net Profit | $200.7M | $434.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 11.7% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 7.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.3% | -0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.9% | 240.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.50 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $200.7M | $434.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.9M | $127.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $169.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.64 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.47 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.68 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.63 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.24 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $15.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $17.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $33.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $36.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $283.3M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $270.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.41× | 6.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $953.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $283.3M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $342.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $270.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.41× | 6.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | 20.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.52× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXPD
| Customs Brokerage And Other Services | $1.1B | 40% |
| Airfreight Services | $1.1B | 39% |
| Ocean Freight And Ocean Services | $611.4M | 21% |
FMS
Segment breakdown not available.
