vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Expeditors International (EXPD) and NEWELL BRANDS INC. (NWL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Expeditors International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.5× NEWELL BRANDS INC.). Expeditors International runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -16.6%, a 23.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NEWELL BRANDS INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.7% vs -3.3%). Expeditors International produced more free cash flow last quarter ($270.3M vs $91.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Expeditors International's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 7.1%).
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 service-based logistics company with headquarters in Bellevue, Washington. Expeditors generates highly optimized and customized supply chain solutions for clients with unified technology systems integrated through a global network of over 340+ locations in 100+ countries on six continents.
Newell Brands Inc. is an American conglomerate of consumer and commercial products. The company's brands and products include Rubbermaid storage/or waste disposal containers; home organization and reusable container products; Contigo and Bubba water bottles; Coleman outdoor products; writing instruments glue ; children's products ; cookware and small appliances and fragrance products.
EXPD vs NWL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $200.7M | $-315.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | -14.3% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -16.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.3% | -2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.9% | -483.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.50 | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $200.7M | $-315.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.3M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.6M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.8M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.9M | $-54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $-198.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.5M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $169.2M | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.5% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | -14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | -2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | -0.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.50 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.64 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.47 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.68 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.63 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.24 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.17 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $203.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $10.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $229.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $219.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $494.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $382.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $372.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $3.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $12.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $12.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $283.3M | $161.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $270.3M | $91.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $953.4M | $17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $283.3M | $161.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | $374.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.2M | $-58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $342.6M | $-213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.7M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.0M | $282.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | $32.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.9M | $32.0M |
| Q4 25 | $270.3M | $91.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.3M | $315.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.3M | $-117.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.5M | $-272.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.7M | $54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.7M | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.8M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.7M | $-27.0M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | -17.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.2% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 17.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.72× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.52× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXPD
| Customs Brokerage And Other Services | $1.1B | 40% |
| Airfreight Services | $1.1B | 39% |
| Ocean Freight And Ocean Services | $611.4M | 21% |
NWL
| Kitchen | $538.0M | 28% |
| Writing | $370.0M | 20% |
| Commercial | $320.0M | 17% |
| Financial Institution Two | $286.0M | 15% |
| Baby | $259.0M | 14% |
| Outdoor And Recreation | $142.0M | 7% |
