vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Expeditors International (EXPD) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Expeditors International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.5× Science Applications International Corp). Expeditors International runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 4.2%, a 2.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Science Applications International Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -3.3%). Expeditors International produced more free cash flow last quarter ($270.3M vs $120.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Expeditors International's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 service-based logistics company with headquarters in Bellevue, Washington. Expeditors generates highly optimized and customized supply chain solutions for clients with unified technology systems integrated through a global network of over 340+ locations in 100+ countries on six continents.
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
EXPD vs SAIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $200.7M | $78.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.3% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.9% | -3.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.50 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $200.7M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.6M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.9M | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.5M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $169.2M | $39.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.50 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.64 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.47 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.68 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.63 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.24 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.17 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $45.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $283.3M | $129.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $270.3M | $120.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.41× | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $953.4M | $478.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $283.3M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.2M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $342.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.7M | $143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | $98.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.9M | $63.0M |
| Q4 25 | $270.3M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.3M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.7M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.7M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.8M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.7M | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.2% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.41× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.72× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.52× | 1.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXPD
| Customs Brokerage And Other Services | $1.1B | 40% |
| Airfreight Services | $1.1B | 39% |
| Ocean Freight And Ocean Services | $611.4M | 21% |
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
