vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Expeditors International (EXPD) and Teledyne Technologies (TDY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Expeditors International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.8× Teledyne Technologies). Teledyne Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs 7.0%, a 10.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teledyne Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.3% vs -3.3%). Teledyne Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($339.2M vs $270.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Expeditors International's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 9.3%).
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 service-based logistics company with headquarters in Bellevue, Washington. Expeditors generates highly optimized and customized supply chain solutions for clients with unified technology systems integrated through a global network of over 340+ locations in 100+ countries on six continents.
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated is an American industrial conglomerate. It was founded in 1960, as Teledyne, Inc. by Henry Singleton and George Kozmetsky.
EXPD vs TDY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $200.7M | $275.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 20.4% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.3% | 7.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.9% | 38.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.50 | $5.81 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $200.7M | $275.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.3M | $220.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.6M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.8M | $188.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.9M | $198.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $262.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.5M | $180.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $169.2M | $178.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 43.0% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.50 | $5.81 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.64 | $4.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | $4.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.47 | $3.99 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.68 | $4.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.63 | $5.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.24 | $3.77 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.17 | $3.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $352.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $10.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $15.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $352.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $528.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $310.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $461.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $649.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $561.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $443.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $912.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $10.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $9.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $9.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $9.3B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $15.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $15.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $15.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $15.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $14.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $14.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $14.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $14.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $283.3M | $379.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $270.3M | $339.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | 21.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.41× | 1.38× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $953.4M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $283.3M | $379.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | $343.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.2M | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $342.6M | $242.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.7M | $332.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.0M | $249.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | $318.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.9M | $291.0M |
| Q4 25 | $270.3M | $339.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.3M | $313.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.3M | $196.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.5M | $224.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.7M | $303.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.7M | $228.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.8M | $301.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.7M | $275.1M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 20.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.2% | 20.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.41× | 1.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 1.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | 1.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | 1.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 0.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.72× | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.52× | 1.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXPD
| Customs Brokerage And Other Services | $1.1B | 40% |
| Airfreight Services | $1.1B | 39% |
| Ocean Freight And Ocean Services | $611.4M | 21% |
TDY
| Commercial And Other | $681.5M | 42% |
| Aerospace And Defense Electronics | $275.9M | 17% |
| Marine Instrumentation | $177.1M | 11% |
| United States Government | $169.0M | 10% |
| Environmental Instrumentation | $120.7M | 7% |
| Engineered Systems | $103.3M | 6% |
| Test And Measurement Instrumentation | $84.8M | 5% |
