vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Expeditors International (EXPD) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Expeditors International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.1× Tapestry, Inc.). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 7.0%, a 15.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -3.3%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $270.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 13.8%).
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 service-based logistics company with headquarters in Bellevue, Washington. Expeditors generates highly optimized and customized supply chain solutions for clients with unified technology systems integrated through a global network of over 340+ locations in 100+ countries on six continents.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
EXPD vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $200.7M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.3% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.9% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.50 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $200.7M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.3M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.6M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.8M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.9M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.5M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $169.2M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.50 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.64 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.47 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.68 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.63 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.24 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.17 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $283.3M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $270.3M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.41× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $953.4M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $283.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.2M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $342.6M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.7M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.9M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $270.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.3M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.3M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.5M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.7M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.7M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.8M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.7M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.2% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.41× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.72× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.52× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXPD
| Customs Brokerage And Other Services | $1.1B | 40% |
| Airfreight Services | $1.1B | 39% |
| Ocean Freight And Ocean Services | $611.4M | 21% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
