vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Expeditors International (EXPD) and TELUS CORP (TU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TELUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $2.9B, roughly 1.3× Expeditors International). Expeditors International runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -4.8%, a 11.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TELUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -3.3%).
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is an American Fortune 500 service-based logistics company with headquarters in Bellevue, Washington. Expeditors generates highly optimized and customized supply chain solutions for clients with unified technology systems integrated through a global network of over 340+ locations in 100+ countries on six continents.
TELUS CORPTUEarnings & Financial Report
Telus Corporation is a Canadian publicly traded holding company and conglomerate, headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, which is the parent company of several subsidiaries: Telus Communications offers telephony, television, data and Internet services; Telus Mobility offers wireless services; Telus Health operates companies that provide health products and services; and Telus Digital operates worldwide, providing multilingual customer service outsourcing and digital IT services. Telus ...
EXPD vs TU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.9B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $200.7M | $-178.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.3% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.9% | -210.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.50 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $200.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.6M | $-178.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.5M | $161.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $169.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.64 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.47 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.68 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.63 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.24 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $2.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $11.8B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $676.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $44.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $41.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $283.3M | $851.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $270.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.41× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $953.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $283.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.2M | $851.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $342.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $270.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.72× | 6.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.52× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
EXPD
| Customs Brokerage And Other Services | $1.1B | 40% |
| Airfreight Services | $1.1B | 39% |
| Ocean Freight And Ocean Services | $611.4M | 21% |
TU
Segment breakdown not available.
