vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Expedia Group (EXPE) and RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD (RNR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Expedia Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.5B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.6× RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD). RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD runs the higher net margin — 23.5% vs 5.8%, a 17.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Expedia Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs -36.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Expedia Group's revenue compounded faster (-0.2% CAGR vs -11.9%).

Expedia Inc. is an online travel agency owned by Expedia Group, based in Seattle. The website and mobile app can be used to book airline tickets, hotel reservations, car rentals, cruise ships, activities and vacation rentals. Expedia.com was launched on October 22, 1996 by Microsoft.

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd is a Bermudian provider of reinsurance, insurance and other related business services. The company operates in reinsurance, insurance and ventures.

EXPE vs RNR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
EXPE
EXPE
1.6× larger
EXPE
$3.5B
$2.2B
RNR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
EXPE
EXPE
+55.5% gap
EXPE
18.7%
-36.8%
RNR
Higher net margin
RNR
RNR
17.7% more per $
RNR
23.5%
5.8%
EXPE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EXPE
EXPE
Annualised
EXPE
-0.2%
-11.9%
RNR

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
EXPE
EXPE
RNR
RNR
Revenue
$3.5B
$2.2B
Net Profit
$205.0M
$515.8M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
11.8%
Net Margin
5.8%
23.5%
Revenue YoY
18.7%
-36.8%
Net Profit YoY
202.5%
72.6%
EPS (diluted)
$1.56
$6.57

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
EXPE
EXPE
RNR
RNR
Q1 26
$3.5B
$2.2B
Q4 25
$3.5B
$3.0B
Q3 25
$4.4B
$3.2B
Q2 25
$3.8B
$3.2B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$3.5B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$4.1B
$4.0B
Q2 24
$3.6B
$2.8B
Net Profit
EXPE
EXPE
RNR
RNR
Q1 26
$205.0M
$515.8M
Q4 25
$205.0M
$760.5M
Q3 25
$959.0M
$916.5M
Q2 25
$330.0M
$835.4M
Q1 25
$-200.0M
$170.0M
Q4 24
$299.0M
$-189.7M
Q3 24
$684.0M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$386.0M
$503.9M
Operating Margin
EXPE
EXPE
RNR
RNR
Q1 26
11.8%
Q4 25
11.8%
42.5%
Q3 25
23.5%
46.3%
Q2 25
12.8%
41.8%
Q1 25
-2.3%
-2.0%
Q4 24
6.8%
-3.6%
Q3 24
18.8%
43.7%
Q2 24
12.7%
25.0%
Net Margin
EXPE
EXPE
RNR
RNR
Q1 26
5.8%
23.5%
Q4 25
5.8%
25.6%
Q3 25
21.7%
28.7%
Q2 25
8.7%
26.1%
Q1 25
-6.7%
4.9%
Q4 24
9.4%
-8.3%
Q3 24
16.8%
29.8%
Q2 24
10.8%
17.8%
EPS (diluted)
EXPE
EXPE
RNR
RNR
Q1 26
$1.56
$6.57
Q4 25
$1.56
$16.16
Q3 25
$7.33
$19.40
Q2 25
$2.48
$17.20
Q1 25
$-1.56
$3.27
Q4 24
$2.10
$-3.76
Q3 24
$5.04
$22.62
Q2 24
$2.80
$9.41

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
EXPE
EXPE
RNR
RNR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$5.7B
$1.6B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$6.2B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
$4.3B
Total Assets
$24.5B
$53.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
4.80×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
EXPE
EXPE
RNR
RNR
Q1 26
$5.7B
$1.6B
Q4 25
$5.7B
$1.7B
Q3 25
$6.2B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$6.7B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$6.1B
$1.6B
Q4 24
$4.5B
$1.7B
Q3 24
$4.9B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$6.3B
$1.6B
Total Debt
EXPE
EXPE
RNR
RNR
Q1 26
$6.2B
Q4 25
$6.2B
$2.3B
Q3 25
$6.2B
$2.2B
Q2 25
$6.2B
$2.3B
Q1 25
$6.2B
$2.8B
Q4 24
$6.3B
$1.9B
Q3 24
$6.3B
$1.9B
Q2 24
$6.3B
$2.0B
Stockholders' Equity
EXPE
EXPE
RNR
RNR
Q1 26
$1.3B
$4.3B
Q4 25
$1.3B
$11.6B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$11.5B
Q2 25
$836.0M
$10.8B
Q1 25
$1.1B
$10.3B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$10.6B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$11.2B
Q2 24
$889.0M
$10.2B
Total Assets
EXPE
EXPE
RNR
RNR
Q1 26
$24.5B
$53.7B
Q4 25
$24.5B
$53.8B
Q3 25
$25.1B
$54.5B
Q2 25
$27.0B
$54.7B
Q1 25
$26.1B
$53.6B
Q4 24
$22.4B
$50.7B
Q3 24
$23.4B
$52.8B
Q2 24
$25.9B
$51.6B
Debt / Equity
EXPE
EXPE
RNR
RNR
Q1 26
4.80×
Q4 25
4.80×
0.20×
Q3 25
4.65×
0.19×
Q2 25
7.43×
0.21×
Q1 25
5.79×
0.27×
Q4 24
4.02×
0.18×
Q3 24
4.74×
0.17×
Q2 24
7.04×
0.19×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons